01-22-2019, 04:46 PM | #23 | ||
Second Lieutenant
217
Rep 210
Posts |
Quote:
I have a GPS radar detector that has been in a dozen vehicles I've owned. All accurate within 1-2 MPH from tire wear.
__________________
2020 X3MC, 2019 M2C
'14 F-150 Tremor, '99 Mustang Turbo |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-22-2019, 04:49 PM | #24 |
Major General
7334
Rep 7,297
Posts |
Maybe you haven't gone very fast then? I have never seen a German car where there wasn't a few percent difference above 100 mph.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-22-2019, 05:05 PM | #25 | |||
Second Lieutenant
146
Rep 277
Posts
Drives: '23 M340i, '16 X3
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Plano, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
Current - 23 G20 M340i, 16 F25 X3 2.8i xdrive
Gone - 19 F87 M2C, 11 E90 335i, 08 E70 X5 3.0i, 04 E46 330i, 95 E36 M3 |
|||
Appreciate
1
chris7197334.00 |
01-22-2019, 05:16 PM | #26 |
Lieutenant
345
Rep 442
Posts |
My M235i always showed 2mph faster than I was actually going, which I suspect is pretty much the norm to account for wheel diameter differences, etc. So, if it said I was going 70, I was actually going 68. I haven't tested my M2C yet.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-22-2019, 11:56 PM | #27 |
Lieutenant
378
Rep 479
Posts
Drives: CB E46 and SG E92 M3s
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Honolulu, HI
|
Wonder what STG2 does.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2019, 12:17 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant
253
Rep 551
Posts |
My former M4 and M2 did an indicated 167 mph on the speedometer, sitting on the speed limiter. I had many opportunities to experience this on the autobahn and each time the results were the same.
Due to the worst traffic I've ever experienced on the autobahn, I was only able to get the M2C up to 174 mph (indicated via phone GPS). Of course, once I dropped the car off, I never saw traffic again. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2019, 12:28 AM | #29 | |
Private First Class
64
Rep 162
Posts |
Quote:
If cars/motorcycles use the wheels to determine the speed, there are too many factors/variables that will impact the speed calculation that I mentioned in my previous post you commented on. Also the speed from a GPS is not exactly correct since there's also inaccuracy but I believe the consensus is it that it's more accurate than a vehicle’s speedometer. So unless I'm mistaken, neither are completely 100% accurate. Just do some google searches. I found this info about GPS calculating speed. Step 1: Using GPS to calculate speed The formula for calculating speed is speed equals distance covered divided by the time taken often represented as x = d/t. By using two GPS points (locations) we can calculate the distance covered. We can use the clock inside the GPS receiver (a very accurate clock that synchronizes regularly with the atomic clocks aboard the GPS satellites) to measure how long it took the vehicle to travel between those two points. In the example below the GPS receiver within the truck records its location (latitude and longitude, or lat/lon) at Point A. It takes note of the time as well. A short while later, say two minutes, it records its location again (Point B) - see below*. The GPS receiver can then perform a calculation using these numbers and determine the speed of the vehicle. *GPS satellites send their positions to receivers on the ground every second. For the purpose of this example, we are comparing position difference over a longer period of time. In a split second the GPS receiver will generally perform the following tasks to determine speed: Convert the difference between the two latitudinal/longitudinal positions into a unit of measurement (you can use online calculators to try this yourself). Determine the difference between the two timestamps to calculate how long it took to get from Point A to Point B. Calculate the average speed based on these results. For example, if the distance was three miles and the time taken was 2 minutes, then the average speed across that distance would be 90mph. Generally, the longer the journey and the more measurements that are taken result in a more accurate, overall speed reading. While some may argue that the speed returned by a GPS receiver is higher than the speedometer in the vehicle, most modern GPS receivers can collect speedometer readings using the OBDII port. This provides a method of verifying the vehicle’s speed. |
|
Appreciate
1
Poochie9104.50 |
01-23-2019, 12:44 AM | #31 | |
Private First Class
64
Rep 162
Posts |
Quote:
I've only driven to Mexico once with some friends but we were in a very old Jeep Wrangler and did not enjoy the wait to cross back over to the US...waited over 2 hours which sucked. Much more convenient and easier to get and out by flying... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-30-2019, 02:09 PM | #33 | |
Luxury at the redline :)
9105
Rep 7,563
Posts |
Quote:
Typo; they meant KLM not MPH probably because the person typing it hates the US-only imperial system of measurement. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-30-2019, 02:27 PM | #34 | |
Second Lieutenant
146
Rep 277
Posts
Drives: '23 M340i, '16 X3
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Plano, TX
|
For a primer on how GPS works:
https://timeandnavigation.si.edu/mul...-does-gps-work Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_signals The GPS receiver chip may be sending NMEA sentences to the CPU at 1 Hz, but often times now that can be 5, 10, or even 20 Hz. It depends on the application and how they program the positioning receiver chipset. uBLOX makes some great low-cost GPS/GNSS receivers. https://www.u-blox.com/en/product/neo-m8u-module And they can be VERY accurate in both position and speed depending on the type of receiver and the software used to interpret the data.
__________________
Current - 23 G20 M340i, 16 F25 X3 2.8i xdrive
Gone - 19 F87 M2C, 11 E90 335i, 08 E70 X5 3.0i, 04 E46 330i, 95 E36 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2022, 02:39 PM | #35 | ||
Private
232
Rep 73
Posts |
Quote:
Soft limiter at 264 kph and the car was pulling strong until that point. It's a UK spec car and I didn't opt for the pack to remove the 155mph limit… |
||
Appreciate
0
|
08-29-2022, 11:18 AM | #36 |
Flavor of the month
888
Rep 716
Posts
Drives: BMW F87 M2C
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Not Sin City, Nevada
|
A friend of mine has a stock M2C comp without the divers package. I think it pulled to 163mpg on GPS before the governor kicked in. I can't remember what track but sounds close enough to the 155 number.
Our X5M's Speedo reads faster for sure. Our M2 is pretty close and the big F-350 is dead on (only with 35x12.5x20 tires mounted). The manual for some Ducati's back in the day stated the speedo was 8% faster than actual speed. Hahah. Weird.
__________________
Samuel of the Internet
2023 F98 X4M Comp 2023 F95 X5M Comp 2020 F87 M2 Comp |
Appreciate
1
dab198195.00 |
08-29-2022, 09:29 PM | #37 |
Second Lieutenant
325
Rep 240
Posts |
I know a guy, drives an M2 Comp with Bootmod 93 tune and cat delete, who touched 180 mph. Somewhere out Western US with no other vehicles within miles... Lived to tell the story but doesn't need to do that again
__________________
'02 E39 M5-Gone
'07 E60 M5-Gone '07 E64 M6 Cab-Gone '17 F87 MG M2-Gone '19 F87 SO M2C |
08-30-2022, 02:52 AM | #38 |
Lieutenant
761
Rep 414
Posts |
I don't have M Drivers Package and my car is limited at 266 kph tacho, 264 GPS. Please say I can't be right so I can share my Vbox screenshot I know its nuts, but what can I do.
Stock software without limiter should be 296 kph. Won't reach 300 kph. With a tune it can reach speeds of over 310 kph/190mph without too much difficulty |
Appreciate
1
chris7197334.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|