05-08-2016, 08:10 PM | #23 |
Captain
428
Rep 715
Posts |
Great report M3Adjuster! I suppose that's what I was expecting
Here here RE the CSL. I'm first in the list at BMW Melbourne. Cheers.
__________________
M4 Times (PSC2): Sandown: 1.21.76 Winton: 1M Times (PSC2): Phillip Island: 1.53.09 Sandown: 1.24.03 Calder Park: 1.07.31 Winton: 1.36.71 |
Appreciate
1
|
05-08-2016, 08:13 PM | #24 |
Captain
368
Rep 697
Posts |
Nice write-up M3 Adjuster.
What alignment settings did the 1M have? The M2 would probably be even faster if it had the same settings as the 1M Coupe. Add some camber plates for the next trackday review! |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2016, 09:08 PM | #25 |
Lieutenant General
3689
Rep 15,081
Posts
Drives: '16 M2, '23 GT4
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NJ
|
Nice write up!
__________________
IG: Trackinheels
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 12:34 AM | #26 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
approximately negative 2.3 degrees camber. on track.. The 1M absolutely murders the front tires without camber plates. The two biggest reasons for the over 15 second difference in Nurburgring time are lack of front camber. On the street the front tires last for more than double the life of the rear tires. The 1M got a modified 1 series strut setup for the front that was not the same as the E90 M3. The BMW M2 benefits from the full setup from the M4 and of course there was a substantial improvement from E9x to F8x. as far as the owner adding camber plates to this particular M2... it's more than likely to remain stock! Last edited by M3 Adjuster; 05-09-2016 at 12:40 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 12:37 AM | #27 |
WTF does Stage 1 mean?
273
Rep 311
Posts |
Did you mount the stock tires on the 1m just for the comparison? It's been about 5 years since I had a set of PS2's on my car, but I remember the transition to the oversteer being rather unfriendly at times.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 12:50 AM | #28 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
technically there are conti sport contacts on the rear of the 1M but lets not make excuses... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 12:59 AM | #29 |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 01:57 AM | #30 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1757
Rep 1,668
Posts |
Quote:
This really sums it up !! Just an awesome write up !! As a former 1M owner I fully agree !! |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 02:56 AM | #31 |
Second Lieutenant
53
Rep 248
Posts |
Great write up, thanks for sharing. Nice comparative pics too.
I would like to see a report from someone driving each on the ragged edge rather than well within their capabilities. That is where I expect the M2 would also outshine the M1 with its wider track and wheelbase, it should be more stable and have superior grip. |
Appreciate
2
|
05-09-2016, 06:13 AM | #32 |
Captain
99
Rep 614
Posts |
Great writeup M3 Adjuster
My take away is that 1M is for the enthusiast near-race car pro/driver while M2 is for mainstream enthusiast/beginner performance driver... i.e. the car has plenty of "forgiveness" as they say in golf |
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 07:16 AM | #33 |
Private First Class
44
Rep 123
Posts |
Nice video overlay. Thanks for sharing that.
Does the BMW M performace app do any sort of real time predictive timing display? That would be the ultimate easter egg! Thanks, Rob Last edited by rjn; 05-09-2016 at 08:10 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 07:28 AM | #34 | |
Major General
1903
Rep 5,678
Posts |
Quote:
Often a car with higher limits and capability is, by definition, more forgiving and easier to manage. The M2, as noted by the lap times, is more capable as we would expect. It's partly more capable because its limits are higher and it is better balanced. For someone who wants the thrill of near death (exaggerating a bit for drama) and a more pure "raw" experience, the 1M is a great option. However, I would argue most professional drivers would prefer the car with higher limits, better control, etc unless they want to play hooligan. To say that the M2 is for the "mainstream enthusiast/beginner performance driver" is not true at all IMO. It is simply a more refined, more controlled version of the 1M. Some people will like the more raw, bite you in the behind feel and character of the 1M. However, even many very experienced track enthusiasts will want the faster car with better balance and higher limits and performance. It doesn't necessarily mean less fun... it means better control is accessible by EVERYONE... beginners and more advanced drivers. Put another way, one of the biggest complaints of the M4 is the happy tail, the lack of grip due to torque, etc. None of this is "preferred" on the track unless you are messing around or want a thrill ride. The 1M is somewhat similar. The M2 corrects this notwithstanding some people like the feel of the alternative. If the M2 was unpredictable and untamed, I bet far MORE people would be complaining.
__________________
2020 X3 M40i | Black | Current DD
2020 C8 Corvette | Z51 | Torch Red ... built and waiting for delivery 2016 M2 | Long Beach Blue | 6MT 2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | DCT 2012 MB C63AMG | 2011 E92 M3 | 2010 E92 M3 Last edited by gthal; 05-09-2016 at 04:02 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
8
|
05-09-2016, 08:03 AM | #35 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
The overlay onto the video is very well done and gives all kinds of info like throttle , brake, gear selection , g force etc. It doesn't provide a predictive lap feature that I have seen, and I agree if it did then there would be pretty much no reason for a solo DL at all. 1M Tex has the original track session video from the M analyzer but it's a large file. one caveat with using your phone for recording is that the M analyzer app records in its own format. It requires additional space on the phone To convert it to a video format that can be exported and uploaded to the web and since the video can be several gb, then it requires a phone with lots of available space on the hard drive. Don't attempt this with an iPhone 16 or 32gb! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 08:19 AM | #36 |
Colonel
4398
Rep 2,856
Posts
Drives: BMW M2 CSL Turbomeister
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Travelling / Managing / Writing
|
Damn, nice write up!
MR |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 08:23 AM | #37 | |
Private First Class
44
Rep 123
Posts |
Quote:
Hoping there might be an easy/elegant way to get some predictive feedback in session, but need to keep reminding myself this is not going to be my track car. For awhile anyway! Thanks again |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 08:27 AM | #38 |
Brigadier General
2051
Rep 3,714
Posts |
1:27 and 1:30? That can't be right, 3.5 and 5.5 seconds slower than a S2000 on 200TW street tires on the 1.7 CCW. Should have let Ken O take the cars out.
Also don't see how you can say 1M has better grip when it has camber plates which is just about the #1 most important mod for front end grip in a Mac strut BMW. Not apples to apples. I do believe the M2 maybe softer but that's not necessarily a bad thing. |
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 08:32 AM | #39 | ||
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
I was hoping Billy Auberlen would drop by but I guess he didn't get my text. Two things - 1- MDM/sport plus - traction control was on for both cars. I was not out to set fastest lap possible in the cars, but more to see the differences between the two in a couple of sessions. Quote:
The 1.7 was definitely slick. Ken and I talked about the lack of grip. He put down. 1:22s on his street tire setup in his TT E46M3. That's after an hour chaning front and rear aero in the paddock and throwing on super sticky RE71-R street tires. 2- To really get a great time from the Michelin Pilot SS I would have had to treat both cars like a qualifying session and totally go balls to wall the first two laps after the warmup lap because the tires were done after lap 3 or 4. There's no way I go to a track and try and set impressive lap times and show up with pilot SS as my hot tire .. ... plus... Last edited by M3 Adjuster; 05-09-2016 at 11:31 AM.. |
||
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 08:35 AM | #40 |
Brigadier General
2051
Rep 3,714
Posts |
|
Appreciate
2
|
05-09-2016, 09:00 AM | #41 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
Come on down to COTA .. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 09:02 AM | #42 | ||
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2016, 09:04 AM | #43 | |
Captain
57
Rep 820
Posts |
Quote:
@Cota = we will add a gt4 to the test too...haha. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-09-2016, 09:11 AM | #44 | |
New Member
10
Rep 16
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
2
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|