12-13-2024, 04:04 AM | #2 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
It appears to be a kit someone has thrown together. The 355 mm to 390 mm rotor OD options is strange because they offer only an AP Racing CP9660 six-piston front caliper. It would be nice to see the caliper QR code and part number to see whether it’s an authentic AP Radi-cal 5000R caliper. The rotors themselves appear to be a no-name brand (not AP, not Girodisc and not Paragon). The caliper adapter bracket is hard to see clearly but I can’t tell if they’re using helicoils or something similar or just threading straight into aluminum.
Who makes this kit and what’s the price? |
Appreciate
1
VGSON393.00 |
12-13-2024, 06:00 AM | #3 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 185
Rep 266
Posts |
Good advice checking the authenticity.
I bought a used set from a member here last year. The first question Essex asked me when I called them to send the calipers in for rebuild was if I was sure they were real AP/Essex. I didn't realize there were fakes out there. |
Appreciate
1
VGSON393.00 |
12-13-2024, 09:56 AM | #4 | |
OG
![]() 393
Rep 518
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2024, 11:56 AM | #5 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Quote:
Definitely ask who makes the rotors because if this company goes out of business and they were the only ones supplying the brake rotors then you’re in trouble when it’s time to replace rotors. The rotor quality doesn’t look to be equivalent to AP Racing J hook rotors, Girodisc curved grove rotors and Paragon curved grove rotors. If the price of a genuine AP Racing 5000R CP9660 caliper brake kit is “really good” then I’d be concerned about the legitimacy of the kit. There are plenty of counterfeit AP Racing kits out there. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2024, 12:05 PM | #6 | |
OG
![]() 393
Rep 518
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2024, 12:17 PM | #7 |
Major
![]() ![]() 738
Rep 1,044
Posts |
Doesn't all genuine AP 5000 R come with J-hook discs?
__________________
BMW M2 LCI -18 | BMW 520DA Touring M-Sport -12
| BMW Z4 M Coupe -06 | BMW M3 -02 | BMW Z3 Coupe -99 | BMW 740i/6 -96 | BMW M5 3.8 -92 | BMW M535i -87 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2024, 02:48 PM | #8 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Quote:
The 355, 362, 378 and 390 mm OD brake rotors, except for the 378 mm OD brake rotor, are not the proper size for any f8x M2, M3 or M4. The largest diameter the CP9660 can use is a 380 mm OD rotor. The fact that a 390 mm OD rotor is an option suggests this kit isn’t put together well and doesn’t fall within the specs of the CP9660 brake caliper. Also, if you assume for a minute that this kit is genuine, there should be four different sized brake caliper adapter brackets to fit the four different sized rotors. The quality of the design and machining of the brake caliper adapter looks like it is a lower quality adapter compared to Essex. |
|
Appreciate
2
VGSON393.00 jritt@essex1083.50 |
12-13-2024, 08:23 PM | #9 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
It’s a kit put together in the UK. Assuming the AP Racing CP9660 are authentic, you’re not saving that much at £3305 ($4170) + shipping for a kit with inferior rotors. The option for a 390 mm OD rotor which is out of spec for the CP9660 is suspect and the 356 mm OD and 362 mm OD are odd rotor ODs for a f8x kit. Essex is having a Black Friday sale right now so I’d play it safe and get the Essex/AP Racing CP9660 with 372 mm OD for $4769 with Ferodo DS2500 pads.
https://www.wgmotorworks.co.uk/produ...ake-kit-front/ |
12-24-2024, 12:02 PM | #11 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
![]() 4158
Rep 56,037
Posts ![]()
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Porterfield R4S for less dust and Ferodo DS2500 for more stopping power. Shoot us a private message if you have any questions about brakes.
|
Appreciate
1
VGSON393.00 |
12-24-2024, 12:24 PM | #12 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Carbotech 1521, G-Lok GS-1 (99% identical to the 1521) and Cobalt XR5 are good street performance pads with minimal dust. The Porterfield R4S are a good option, too, but the amount of dust generated can vary with the R4S (not the R4 which is a track pad). My set had minor dust (~90% less than stock) but I’ve heard and seen some sets with moderate dust (~40% less than stock).
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 09:10 AM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 3127
Rep 3,973
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 09:35 AM | #14 | |
Banned
15684
Rep 3,974
Posts |
Quote:
Akebono 1880 & 1656 FTW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 09:37 AM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 3127
Rep 3,973
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 10:07 AM | #16 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Quote:
Yes. The 1521, which I’ve used for 25 years as a street pad in stock and fixed calipers, the GS-1 (the family that owns Carbotech disagreed on the direction to take the company so some of the family left and started G-Loc) and the XR5 all have pad options to fit the AP Racing 9660 and 9449/9451 (is 9440 a typo? 9440 caliper max rotor diameter is 330 mm). Carbotech has the pad profile defined by the AP caliper number. G-LOC offers them but they may be listed by the PFC pad number. CP9660 is PFC 7790 and CP9449/9452 is PFC 7768 (typically made by increasing the IR of the PFC 7769 pad). The Cobalt CP9668 pad is AP19 and you need to specify the pad thickness. The Cobalt CP9449/9451 pad is the AP13. I’d give the Cobalt XR5 if you want something that performs very similar to the R4S and 1521. I’ve continued to use the 1521 compound because I have yet to run into a race pad incompatibility with the 1521 (I primarily use PFC but Cobalt and Carbotech are my backups if I can’t find the PFC compounds I’m looking for). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 10:29 AM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 3127
Rep 3,973
Posts |
Quote:
Which of the three that you listed would you consider the most aggressive? Would prefer minimal decrease in performance while keeping the silent nature of the R4S, but less dust. Last edited by ZM2; 12-25-2024 at 10:35 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 11:05 AM | #18 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Quote:
I’d say the Cobalt XR5 compound will be the closest to the R4S with a decent reduction of brake dust. Less of brake dust does result in a slight loss of performance. As an FYI, the Cobalt XR1 race compound is actually a solid race compound with the performance closest to my favorite PFC 05 compound (PFC 11 is an updated version but with a very progressive CoF curve). A lot of people aren’t even aware of Cobalt. I’ve used F/R XR1/XR1 on my e92 M3 with PFC Z31/Z31 (4 pads/caliper) calipers and it performed as well as the PFC F/R 11/11 on my e92 with PFC Z54/Z45 calipers. Another nice thing about Cobalt, just like Carbotech, they’ll make custom pads if you supply the pad backing plates. The Z31 pads were custom but now it’s one of their standard brake pads. |
|
Appreciate
1
ZM23127.00 |
12-25-2024, 11:37 AM | #19 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 3127
Rep 3,973
Posts |
Quote:
I’ll try to source the 7790/7767 shapes for the XR5’s. Btw, I’m running 378x36 front and 380x34 rear. I figured the larger 7767 pad shape would help shift more bias to the rear. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 11:57 AM | #20 |
Banned
15684
Rep 3,974
Posts |
Sorry, I thought the AP kit was abandoned!
For the 2NH I know you can get the CarboTech 1521 and Redstuffs, but not sure about the AP caliper, sorry. G-Loc does make the GS1 for the AP calipers on my Exige, which is what I have, and I'm happy with them, but they aren't as good as the Akebono's. ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
12-25-2024, 12:21 PM | #21 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 4323
Rep 7,867
Posts |
Quote:
I’m not familiar with the Paragon PA025 rear brake kit rotor ODs and pad profiles and thicknesses. A pad with a shorter PRD actually increases brake torque over a pad with a longer PRD. The longer PRD reduces the mean rotor radius and, therefore, reduces the braking torque magnitude. This would shift the brake bias forward. For brake bias calculations, the mean rotor diameter = rotor OR - PRD / 2 so longer PRD = reduced brake torque. Looking at the Cobalt AP2 (PFC 7767), it only comes in a 20 mm thick pad. I’m unsure whether Cobalt will make an 18 mm thick, or thinner, version of the AP2. This pad is used in Radical track/race cars. |
|
Appreciate
1
ZM23127.00 |
12-25-2024, 01:28 PM | #22 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 3127
Rep 3,973
Posts |
Quote:
Gotcha on the PRD. I guess the larger pad just helps with lifespan, which isn’t a huge concern on the rear? Is the bias impacted that much bn 7767 49mm & 7766 43mm? Thanks! Last edited by ZM2; 12-25-2024 at 01:40 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|