03-25-2016, 12:23 PM | #67 | |
Captain
602
Rep 886
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2016, 02:53 PM | #68 |
Major General
13521
Rep 8,164
Posts |
AMAZING spec.
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-25-2016, 03:54 PM | #69 | |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
Quote:
I don't understand your issue with a company being profitable. You act like it's a bad thing - they price the cars according to what the market will bear - supply and demand, blah blah blah ... free market capitalism and all that good stuff. Have you ever owned one? Last edited by sgrinavi; 03-25-2016 at 04:18 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-25-2016, 04:50 PM | #70 | |
Captain
602
Rep 886
Posts |
Quote:
Like I said previously,luck of the draw and nothing personal aimed at you |
|
Appreciate
2
|
03-25-2016, 08:09 PM | #71 | |
Lieutenant General
7490
Rep 12,309
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
2
|
03-25-2016, 09:15 PM | #72 |
Second Lieutenant
54
Rep 238
Posts |
Forgo the M2 & sell the e9x and you have the 911. Although, I think M2+e36+e92 > 911.
|
Appreciate
2
|
03-26-2016, 01:51 PM | #73 | |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2016, 01:53 PM | #74 |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2016, 11:10 PM | #75 |
Major
110
Rep 1,291
Posts |
I thought 991 GTS started from model year 2013/14, but I don't live in USA so I could be wrong. Maybe it was launched earlier there ;-)
__________________
Must stop eating..............
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-27-2016, 12:34 AM | #76 | |
Lieutenant General
7490
Rep 12,309
Posts |
Quote:
I absolutely love variety, so having a bunch of M cars from different eras is just as great as having a 911 IMO |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2016, 07:02 PM | #77 | |
Second Lieutenant
94
Rep 267
Posts |
Quote:
Just test drove 991.1 MT, black edition convertible. Much better driving experience than all of my ///Ms. It is a perfect weekend car. I would never be able to do DD the 991. I cannot make a comment on the M2 since I have never driven one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2016, 09:55 AM | #78 |
Lieutenant General
4972
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Just curious what drives the DD or not conversation - I DD my 981 everyday and it works pretty well. Is it a lack of creature comforts? Or no good parking spots at work?
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2016, 06:42 PM | #79 | |
Second Lieutenant
94
Rep 267
Posts |
Quote:
The clutch in the 991 is way too stiff to drive in greater DC area during traffic for me. If I opted for a PDK I could probably do DD. 991 has plenty creature comfort for me. And the seats are outstanding. IMO, AMG seats>Porsche 14 and 18 adjustable seats>BMW///M seats. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 07:04 PM | #80 | |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
Quote:
The seats are really nice, not as planted as the CF GT2 sport seats I had in my 997, but way more comfortable. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 07:07 PM | #81 |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
Here she is, all tinted out and cleaned up
|
Appreciate
2
|
04-19-2016, 07:51 PM | #82 |
Major
1118
Rep 1,054
Posts |
Disagree with all the Porsche reliability stuff around here. Do your research.
Porsche is the most reliable of all car manufacturers for the last 3 years. ANY manufacturer..including Toyota/Lexus, which are considered the bastions of reliability. http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...lity-study-iqs 2015 http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...lity-study-iqs 2014 Not saying jdpower is the end all be all, but they list Porsche tops for 2013, 2014, 2015. And at least they use a lager sample size, compared to people having their own personal issues with the brand. If someone can show me a more reliable source/metric, I will happily eat my words. Yes, Porsche can nickel/dime you, but you are getting a world class sports car with world class build and a world class reputation. That costs money.... Everybody has their experiences... My previous BMW was ultra reliable. Kept it for 15 years with minimal issues. But for many that's not the case. sgrinavi, nice car. I had Sapphire Blue before and loved that color. But Agate Grey is really nice itself. Last edited by csbear; 04-19-2016 at 08:08 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 09:36 PM | #83 | |
Second Lieutenant
94
Rep 267
Posts |
Quote:
My 1996 993 C2 and 2004 Cayenne S never gave me any trouble besides the normal wear and tear issues. Matter fact, 5 MB and 6 BMW not one single issue. I think they are all reliable if you take proper care, except RR. I had a 1999 Range Rover (wife's car), worst car ever made. What a pile of sh**. 13 years later, I still can't get my wife within 100 yards of a Land Rover dealership. 1990 e30 325i and 1996 993 C2 were the two best cars I had the pleasure of driving. |
|
Appreciate
2
|
04-20-2016, 07:12 AM | #84 |
Lieutenant
68
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2012 911GTS & 2014 X1
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SW FL
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 07:27 AM | #85 | |
Lieutenant General
7490
Rep 12,309
Posts |
Quote:
That survey determines the owner's satisfaction during the FIRST 90 days. So 3 months and maybe 3-5k miles on the car? Who cares? I own my cars long term and I want to know how they do at 50k miles. The chances of things going wrong in the first 90 days are slim. I don't even know if these things put weight on particular issues. It's one thing if your phone does not connect to your infotainment, but what if you are stuck on the side of the highway with a hole in your engine block? Again, don't get me wrong, I love love love Porsche to death and hope to one day own one. But J.D Powers is a joke IMO. I know the manufacturer's would never release the data, but I'd be far more interested in seeing warranty claim numbers.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-20-2016, 09:27 AM | #86 | |
Major
1118
Rep 1,054
Posts |
Quote:
However, Toyota/Lexus have topped these charts for decades (less so recently). No one is debating against their overall reliability. So is it a coincidence that they also last longer than most cars past 50K, 100K, 200K etc? At the bottom of the list: Jeep, Land Rover, etc. Is that a coincidence as well? They are perennially on the bottom for years and are notorious by their owners to have bad reliability. You said, "The chances of things going wrong in the first 90 days are slim." Then why are Land Rover and Jeep exhibiting these problems very early on as evident in the JDPower survey? And why do they continue to do so throughout the years? If they are this bad early on, their owners are in for a world of hurt at 50,000K miles or more. I definitely see what you are saying, but if cars from the start are built well, that means they have high standards for quality control. That high quality will be exhibited through much of their lineup, and play a part in long term reliability as well. I will take my chances on these top cars then those far down the list no matter what a few people experiences were on the interwebz. (Although I don't base my car choices on JD Power ) But yes, you are right, the important reliability data (engine problems, warranty information, etc) for cars should be more readily available, but unfortunately it isn't. And it is pretty difficult to say what a car will be like 100,000K miles from now no matter what brand. Too many variables: how the owner took care of the car, or the weather it resided in, or if it is city driving vs highway driving, etc. 100,000K miles is a huge amount of mechanical wear on any car. And most problems really are the minor stuff anyways... I would gather that engine issues are a lot more rare as engine technology today is pretty robust. I don't see many people on these forums complaining that their BMW was stranded on the side of the road due to engine failures. And if they did , they got a lemon or were really bad with oil changes, etc. If a company had many engine issues with a particular car for years, the company would be out of business real soon. I agree, you can't read into everything JDPower says, but consumers can use it as a guide. But more importantly, if you have a well known brand with even decent reliability, just take care of your car and you will be in good shape. Last edited by csbear; 04-20-2016 at 09:45 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 11:45 AM | #88 |
Lieutenant General
4972
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
The proof is in the pudding. I am genuinely curious to see if a standard M2, 3 or 4 could do this as well...
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
1
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|