02-22-2019, 09:05 AM | #46 | |
Colonel
3179
Rep 2,577
Posts |
Quote:
Time difference between 100-200 and 60-130 is roughly 1 sec. Which is why I was saying M2C advantage goes from 1-1.2s to 1.5s tops. I timed way more runs than most of guys here in past few years. At 200kph (real world pace, not odometer) OG is already at 5th, there is no sudden asthma from there. I've already said M2C is two levels above OG acceleration wise stock for stock, but not 3s quicker in 60-130. You know what 3s really is? 3s is like going from first gen PWG N55 to the M2.
__________________
Lemania 2320
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 09:49 AM | #47 | |
S0THPAW
8680
Rep 7,846
Posts |
Quote:
As stated by C&D:60-130 It's 3 seconds. Period. Sorry but that's a fact 200-210kmh (124-130mph )is a very slow process relatively in OG M2 compared to M2C. I had an OG M2 DCT and now have an M2C. You? Whatever, I just wanted to explain to you the difference between MPH and KMH numbers but if you do not get that, what else can I say or do? Just write an email to C& D that they are so plain wrong and you know everything better(it seems) LOL Cheers Robin |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 10:55 AM | #50 | ||
Private First Class
424
Rep 133
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
96 318Ti with S52 turbo (11.1 @138), 03 E46 M3, 15 F80 M3 YMB, 17 C7 Z06, 19 M2 Comp
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 11:27 AM | #51 |
Private First Class
94
Rep 109
Posts |
|
Appreciate
8
|
02-22-2019, 04:51 PM | #52 |
enthusiasm > practicality
4019
Rep 2,247
Posts
Drives: 987 CS | G35x
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Chester County, PA
|
It goes both ways, boys. The infighting has been relentless. It sure does make for good keyboard battles though, no?
__________________
FSI 3.8L Stg II|6MT|SOUL|IPD+GT3 TB|Numeric Racing|KW|Tarett|Rennline|Raceseng|APEX|Recaro|7.3 lb/hp
VQ35HR|5AT|Stillen|FI|UpRev tune 8k rpm|TransGo|Hotchkis|Whiteline|H&R|Z1|Corbeau|R1 Concepts|10 lb/hp Left lane campers, GTFO! |
Appreciate
2
cptobvious2531.50 clee1982796.00 |
02-22-2019, 06:09 PM | #53 |
Second Lieutenant
105
Rep 259
Posts
Drives: 16' AW 340i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orwelian Paradise
|
If this car ever gets the S58 I'll consider it.
__________________
Their whole life sheep are scared of the wolf but in the end, it's the sheppard who eats them.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 08:37 AM | #55 | |
Lieutenant
757
Rep 413
Posts |
Quote:
I am also very involved in 100-200 and similar timings and I know that for a fact. It really is about 1.5 secs from 100-210. From 100-200 the M2C does about 10secs, whereas the M2 about 11,x. Expecting 2 seconds difference from 200-210 is lunatic. Are we comparing the M2C with the OG M2 or with a Golf 2.0 TDI? Btw, I've ordered the M2C and it will be my first BMW, so I'm not biased. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 10:18 AM | #56 |
S0THPAW
8680
Rep 7,846
Posts |
Facts? Have you driven OG M2 and M2C 60-130mph (96.5-209kmh)
So C&D tested an actual M2C doing that in 3s faster than OG M2 60-130mph. As I already stated I find that conclusion plausible because I myself find the M2C way stronger above 160kmh(100mph and above 200kmh(124mph) than my ex OG M2... So why are C&D's facts and my (same) experience doubtful? I do not get this. Cheers Robin |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 02:59 PM | #57 |
Private First Class
338
Rep 130
Posts |
Here is a factual comparison of both cars' performances: http://www.zeperfs.com/en/duel5975-7280.htm
The values shown are average values from car magazine tests. Let's see the value for 0-250km/h (0-155.3 mph): 29.6s for the M2, 29.4s for the M2C. 80-180 km/h (49.7 - 111.8 mph) then? 8.6s for the M2, 8.5s for the M2C. Sure, the M2C is an amazing car, and is faster than the M2, especially when the air is hot. But not THAT faster Robin, sorry to bother you again, but based on the problems that you encountered with your previous M2 (engine breathless above 200kmh, multiple limp-modes even on the high way), my guess is that your car had a serious issue and that you would have done better complaining to BMW instead of buying them a new car |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 03:14 PM | #58 | |
Lieutenant
757
Rep 413
Posts |
Quote:
As an example I now have in mind, my father in law has a Cayenne GTS V8 and I feel like it easily does <5 seconds from 0-100. We measured 6 (without LC). So much for feeling! The measurements from all magazines need to be taken with a grain of salt. Many simply don't know how to do it, measure without correcting times (if driving with a slope uphill or downhill), drive below bridges where you lose signal for a while, etc. Besides this, many magazines measure with the car packed with video equipment inside and 2 people, which makes times questionable. All in all, times should always be compared on same conditions. Fact #1: M2C does about 10.0 from 100-200 km/h. Many people have measured this already with one person in the car and corrected times. A few even below 10.0, as well as a few above. M2 does it in 11,2-11,5. All times taken for DCT. Fact #2: there will never, ever, be a >1 sec difference from 200 to 210. This doesn't have to be discussed, it's that obvious. I'm not personally attacking you, I'm just trying to show you that what you feel doesn't really correspond to the reality 1:1. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 03:19 PM | #59 |
Major
1054
Rep 1,459
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2019, 06:58 PM | #62 | |
Brigadier General
2696
Rep 3,315
Posts |
Here is factual comparison of instrumented testing from C&D:
Quote:
__________________
Current Stable:
2024 G20 M340i Melbourne Red/Cognac 2019 F87 M2 Competition 6MT, LBB, slicktop, exec pkg 2007 E91 328i Silver, slushbox, Eibach fr/E93 M3 rear sway bars, ARC-8 |
|
Appreciate
1
Robin_NL8679.50 |
02-24-2019, 05:50 AM | #63 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
750
Rep 1,857
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
02-24-2019, 06:12 AM | #64 |
Major
2621
Rep 1,477
Posts
Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zurich
|
I've never owned a M2, but I drove both M2 and M2C and it's clear that the competition is noticeably faster, the OG M2 has a strong low-end torque but everything that happens over 3000rpm on the M2C is unattainable to the M2, I can't say now many seconds but no chance to compete. And at high speed the power at the top makes the difference.
|
02-25-2019, 12:54 AM | #65 |
S0THPAW
8680
Rep 7,846
Posts |
If people still think 0-200kmh is exactly 60-130mph
And the people who think those numbers are the same, even stated they haven't driven both cars in comparison at that speeds and doubt C&D for it. And take the rest for granted even if the rest doesn't do 60-130mph tests. Bravo. Cheers Robin |
Appreciate
1
VIERsr2620.50 |
02-25-2019, 01:13 AM | #66 |
S0THPAW
8680
Rep 7,846
Posts |
Tadaa, 3.4s faster than OG M2....
Sometimes OG almost equals M2C's lap/sprinttimes, sometimes it does not. There are many factors involved. C& D had a slower(...) OG M2 and a faster(...)M2C obviously and so did those French guys. Cheers Robin |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|