08-28-2019, 11:28 AM | #1 |
Private
40
Rep 78
Posts |
2017 M2 dyno results.
Finally got to get on a dyno after doing some bolt ons/ tune. When I got there, I saw that it was going to run on a mustang dyno and was a little bummed because they are known to be low. I have both uncorrected and corrected weather numbers and am pleased with the results. 397.5hp 460 tq. W/wcf 454.1 hp 525.5 tq.
6spd Bm3 stage 2 93 Csf intercooler ER catless downpipe Injen intake Stock exhaust Interested to hear your thoughts, 85 degrees and about 89 percent humidity. |
08-28-2019, 12:44 PM | #2 |
Major
521
Rep 1,485
Posts |
the 397whp on mustang seems a bit high for a fbo n55, especially with those weather conditions. The 376whp number seems more correct. how much psi are you running?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2019, 01:46 PM | #3 | |
Enlisted Member
30
Rep 43
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
JTO245271.50 |
08-28-2019, 09:18 PM | #6 | |
Private
40
Rep 78
Posts |
Quote:
397 was the highest non corrected number. The 376 is the average of the min and max number in the pull and means nothing as far as peak power numbers go. Or am I wrong? Torque is nasty and why it blows the tires off lol. To the person asking about the intake, no wires modified but I have a bm3 ots stage 2 93 tune Along about 93 pump running 93 with VP octane booster 1 liter 10 gallons Last edited by nismoman; 08-28-2019 at 09:33 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2019, 10:59 PM | #7 |
Colonel
3179
Rep 2,577
Posts |
Mustang can show high and low as the operator's wish, unlike Dynojet which cannot be manipulated easily.
Dynojet always reads high and not accurately (inertia method). But Dynojet numbers are always the norm because it's very consistent wherever and whenever you are. You need to do a baseline stock flash run on that mustang to give your results true meaning.
__________________
Lemania 2320
|
Appreciate
1
JTO245271.50 |
08-28-2019, 11:54 PM | #8 | |
Private
40
Rep 78
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
D22M21372.50 |
08-29-2019, 02:33 AM | #9 |
Major
564
Rep 1,092
Posts |
Nah, screw the numbers. Does the car pull well with no torque dips? It sure does, that's all that matters.
I had an unexpectedly high readings on a mustang dyno and operator went "oops, I left it in a "dynojet simulation" mode. Really the only usable dyno readings are when you have a baseline, trustworthy operator, and ideally similar weather between the pulls. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-29-2019, 07:34 AM | #10 | |
Private
40
Rep 78
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-29-2019, 11:00 AM | #11 | |
Major
521
Rep 1,485
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-29-2019, 04:38 PM | #12 |
Private
40
Rep 78
Posts |
Yeah I'm not familiar with the mustang dyno layout of numbers, just that the first low pull is probably the 3/4 revved pull is the low number and then i did one full pull and 397 showed on the screen after completing it. Then the printed graph shows the corrected number of 4 something. I personally think the 397 is the real number and will be similar on a dyno jet, rather than "mustang's read low that means I'm over 400". I know it is almost impossible to make over 400 without additional fueling and the 397 makes sense with the mods and 100 octane. I just didn't want to see a 350 rwhp run lol and more shocked of the dump truck torque.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-30-2019, 09:38 AM | #13 | |
Major
521
Rep 1,485
Posts |
Quote:
usually mustang and dyno dynamtics dynos about 10% lower compared to a dynojet |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|