BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW M2 Forum > BMW M2 CS Model > M2 CS - geometry - anyone know what's changed ?

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-14-2021, 05:12 AM   #45
M2C_PLUS
Major
M2C_PLUS's Avatar
1774
Rep
1,262
Posts

Drives: BMW 1M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 BMW M2 Comp  [0.00]
2020 BMW X3M Comp  [0.00]
2011 BMW 1M  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davil View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2C_PLUS View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2Debt View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_lab_rat View Post
So in decimal degrees that's

0.10 toe, 1.80 camber in the front
0.27 toe, 1.40 camber in the back

That's not far from what I'm running on the OG (0.05, 1.8 and 0.10, 1.6)
How does the M2CS achieve 1.8 degrees of camber? I thought the M2 and M2C were limited to 1.5 without camber plates or hubs. Ive seen ~1.8 is achievable with the added camber from lowering ride height, but the CS is noted to be about the same height as previous F87's.
If that 1.8 is true on the M2CS you can achieve that by adding Camber hubs and keep stock height.

Keeping stock height with camber hubs gives between 1.7-1.8 neg camber. Lowering with camber hubs (like I have done) you can end up with 2.2 neg "fixed" camber with the correction hubs.
But that's just static camber. Depending on travel you may have no more dynamic camber which is the bit that actually counts. So you may just be wearing out your inner tyres and introducing annoying steering. File under the many reasons why I hate lowering springs. If you have a proper coil over setup, properly corner weighted and properly aligned then disregard this post.
Coils, camber correction hubs, M2CS Racing roll bars, front thrust arm Millway uniballs bushes and full geo/corner weighted with me in drivers seat (127kg)


Do it right or not at all

But, my car is actually going under surgery at Litchfield Motors, removing M Perf coils and fitting Nitron's
Attached Images
     
Appreciate 4
Bee Pee1768.00
Davil6467.50
      01-14-2021, 05:57 AM   #46
Bee Pee
Brigadier General
Bee Pee's Avatar
United Kingdom
1768
Rep
4,509
Posts

Drives: AW M2 DCT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SW London

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davil View Post
If you have a proper coil over setup, properly corner weighted and properly aligned then disregard this post.
MPerf coilovers + OEM -0.5deg hubs, Bimmerworld UCA/TS monoballs and fully fettled & setup at Center Gravity.
Attached Images
   
__________________
Fettled M135i EB AT then AW M2 DCT - both gone but not forgotten:

Current '22 X3M LCI..
Appreciate 6
CSBM52715.00
M2C_PLUS1774.00
CarJunkie2615.50
Davil6467.50
      01-14-2021, 07:41 PM   #47
M2Debt
Private First Class
M2Debt's Avatar
98
Rep
103
Posts

Drives: '17 Alpine White M2
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Jacksonville, FL

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2C_PLUS View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2Debt View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_lab_rat View Post
So in decimal degrees that's

0.10 toe, 1.80 camber in the front
0.27 toe, 1.40 camber in the back

That's not far from what I'm running on the OG (0.05, 1.8 and 0.10, 1.6)
How does the M2CS achieve 1.8 degrees of camber? I thought the M2 and M2C were limited to 1.5 without camber plates or hubs. Ive seen ~1.8 is achievable with the added camber from lowering ride height, but the CS is noted to be about the same height as previous F87's.
If that 1.8 is true on the M2CS you can achieve that by adding Camber hubs and keep stock height.

Keeping stock height with camber hubs gives between 1.7-1.8 neg camber. Lowering with camber hubs (like I have done) you can end up with 2.2 neg "fixed" camber with the correction hubs.
I didn't see it mentioned anywhere that the CS had the camber correction hubs and wanted to confirm that was how it hit the 1.8.
Enjoying the insight on this thread. I was interested in avoiding the added NVH of camber plates; starting digging into alternatives for more camber and I ended up here.
Appreciate 0
      01-14-2021, 10:07 PM   #48
CarJunkie
Colonel
CarJunkie's Avatar
United_States
2616
Rep
2,819
Posts

Drives: e82 1M, f87 M2cs
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tri-Cities, Washington

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2020 M2cs  [0.00]
2011 BMW 1M  [0.00]
Not sure if they have a product for the f87 platform, but Vorshlag camber plates did not increase NVH at all on my e82 and definitely improved steering feel due to the pillow all mount and massive rotational bearing. There is no play at all, hence no noise.

I have heard that GC plates can cause some rattle.
__________________
1M track toy mods: BMS chargepipe, BMS OCC, ADE FMIC, ADE motor mounts, MadDad/Lightweight Ti exhaust, ADE custom oil thermostat/cooler, custom MHD tune, F10 550i clutch, Ohlins R+T, Vorschlag camber plates, M3 'vert FSB with Turner endlinks, Stoptech Trophy BBK.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM.




m2
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST