06-11-2020, 07:35 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
175
Rep 247
Posts |
Removed secondary cats (video)
I removed the secondary cats from my otherwise stock M2 Competition (just replaced the two secondary cats with straight pipe) and took short before and after revving videos for comparison. I'm pleased with it. The volume increased 10-15% and there's no additional rasp. The tone is a little bit deeper. It's a pretty subtle change, but I definitely here it when driving.
I know conventional wisdom says that there is no performance to be gained by removing the secondary cats because they are not restrictive, but the butt dyno feels stronger at higher RPMs. Picture of cat below. I'm no expert, but it looks restrictive to me! Edit: I can't get the Vimeo tags to work, so you'll have to just use the links: Before: https://vimeo.com/428322626 After: https://vimeo.com/428322644 |
06-12-2020, 01:49 PM | #2 |
Major
1103
Rep 1,263
Posts
Drives: 20 BMW M2C 17 Mazda MX-5 RF
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: "Get Busy Living, or Get busy Dying"
|
Why go this route when AA and others make a well designed and tested midpipe with Sec Cat delete...Unless you just trying to save a FEW BUCKS?
__________________
2005-2006 BMWCCA Boston Chapter president
2004 Mazda Rev It Up Finalist 2002-Present HPDE Instructor My 2020M2C Build: https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1696726 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2020, 02:32 PM | #3 |
Second Lieutenant
175
Rep 247
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2020, 04:41 PM | #4 |
Colonel
1558
Rep 2,505
Posts |
You get more benefit from removing the reasonator. You should of done that as well.
__________________
2019 M2 Competition- October 2, 2018 ED
2011 BMW M3 Sedan Alpine White Picked up via ED 9/27/2011 & Redelivered 11/23/2011 **SOLD** |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2020, 01:18 AM | #5 | |
Captain
355
Rep 719
Posts |
Quote:
are you referring to performance or sound? The stock system is very well designed and may as well be almost a straight pipe setup with the removal of primary and secondary cats. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2020, 08:10 AM | #6 |
Major
1103
Rep 1,263
Posts
Drives: 20 BMW M2C 17 Mazda MX-5 RF
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: "Get Busy Living, or Get busy Dying"
|
Almost all of us like to save a few dollars on mods so that we have more money for additional mods.
The OP's solution is simple but not as "clean" or tested as an AA midpipe. My way of thinking after 30 years of modding cars was to add the AA Midpipe then go with a set of Wagner 200 cell HFC's and painting the OEM muffler black to hide it. IMHO the cost of a full exhaust is a waste of my dollars, and this way I get max performance and way better sound for my money.. My build: https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1696726
__________________
2005-2006 BMWCCA Boston Chapter president
2004 Mazda Rev It Up Finalist 2002-Present HPDE Instructor My 2020M2C Build: https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1696726 |
Appreciate
1
G80BSM283.50 |
06-15-2020, 08:30 AM | #7 | ||
Colonel
2860
Rep 2,067
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2020, 06:30 AM | #8 |
Captain
355
Rep 719
Posts |
Sorry buddy, I honestly don't agree with you.
if you had to take the secondary cats and primary cats out and run stock exhaust with Valve open and an aftermarket catback exhaust I doubt there will be even 5HP difference. all the power is made from the primary cats and secondary cats. the reason the AAW midpipe makes gains is because of the removal of the secondaries. look at the design of the OEM exhaust and you can clearly see it's straight pipe when valves are open. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-19-2020, 11:03 PM | #9 | |
Colonel
2860
Rep 2,067
Posts |
Quote:
Here you go skipper |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-19-2020, 11:09 PM | #10 | |
First Lieutenant
284
Rep 320
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
E90->F30->F80-F87->G80->G87
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2020, 07:47 AM | #11 | |
Major
1103
Rep 1,263
Posts
Drives: 20 BMW M2C 17 Mazda MX-5 RF
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: "Get Busy Living, or Get busy Dying"
|
Quote:
No rasp, no smell...awesome sound with the exhaust flaps open at start
__________________
2005-2006 BMWCCA Boston Chapter president
2004 Mazda Rev It Up Finalist 2002-Present HPDE Instructor My 2020M2C Build: https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1696726 |
|
Appreciate
1
G80BSM283.50 |
06-21-2020, 02:28 AM | #12 | |
First Lieutenant
284
Rep 320
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks
__________________
E90->F30->F80-F87->G80->G87
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2020, 05:06 AM | #13 |
Captain
355
Rep 719
Posts |
thanks very much for this but i am well aware of it.
Just a side note the reason they gained power is not because of the midpipe but because of the removal of secondary Cat, the midpipe mitigates. Remove the secondary cat on your stock units and it will also gain power and less back pressure. the akra also makes power actually and more power than the slip-on WHY???? because the bulk of the gains come from downpipe and midpipe. http://www.akrapovic.com/en/car/prod...70&yearId=5052 http://www.akrapovic.com/en/car/prod...70&yearId=5052 back to my point on the exhaust, remove primary and secondary Cats and valves open it's just about a straight pipe!! might not sound the greatest but it will make the most power with the least back pressure. go educate yourself on what the original stock exhaust looks like when the valves are open and how it flows. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2020, 05:33 AM | #14 | |
Colonel
2860
Rep 2,067
Posts |
Quote:
I agree that after the primary components of the mid pipe are removed it's basically straight. Why you said you disagree with me. Idk. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2020, 05:05 AM | #15 |
RIP E39
37
Rep 30
Posts |
Not agreeing or disagreeing with anything posted thus far, but here's first hand experience to describe how modifying the stock system works.
My buddy (2020 M2C) initially only installed cat-less downpipes. The car was a bit louder, but nothing obnoxious. His next step was deleting the secondary cats and the resonator. They were replaced with separate straight pipes. With the valves closed, car was fairly quiet, not much louder than stock. With the valves open, car was pretty loud and sounded good (in my opinion). However, at load at around 1600 RPM, the exhaust developed a loud rattle based on the resonance in the exhaust. This annoyed him so he had only the resonator re-installed. The car is a little quieter/less aggressive sounding than before, but the rattle is gone. On my 2020 M2C, I did the same thing at first. Cat-less down pipes, secondary cats and resonator delete (I thought I might get lucky with the valve rattle). At first it was fine, but after about 1000 miles the rattle got so bad to where it buzzed and rattled under almost any condition. So, I had the valves removed and the muffler completely gutted (I wanted to keep the stock tips and this was the cheapest option for now.) If I recall, even with the valves open, there is some muffling being done. Yes, stock it is a straight shot through the muffler after the open valve, but there are holes in the pipe with some dampening material around them. Once I had that removed, the exhaust is noticeably louder. Also has a more aggressive tone. To summarize: Cat-less downpipes = moderate noise increase above + secondary cats delete = car is loud, but still reasonable above + resonator delete = car is slightly louder and has more resonance/drone (may cause rattles/buzzing) above + valve and muffler internals delete (totally straight piped) = very loud, very aggressive sound. No rattles/buzzing. Lots of drone (doesn't bother me). I also disabled active sound (which removes the artificial burbles). Now it has a few natural cracks and pops. Sounds so much better with it off. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|