08-26-2018, 06:58 PM | #23 |
Second Lieutenant
568
Rep 276
Posts |
Not much, my other one had 13k on it and still basically the same a little better but not much. My GT4 is just the opposite solid, precise, short through and smooth. That's what makes the M2 feel stand out to me. carl
Last edited by carl44; 08-26-2018 at 07:06 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2018, 07:09 PM | #25 |
Major General
4449
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: '19 M2C
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
|
Ok, it will be interesting to read a comparison after the 1200 mile service.
__________________
www.ReTuneTheDeTune.com
2019 M2 Competition (Sunset Orange) |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2018, 07:21 PM | #26 | |
Private First Class
205
Rep 189
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Old Geezer; 08-26-2018 at 07:31 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2018, 07:28 PM | #27 | |
Private First Class
205
Rep 189
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2018, 07:47 PM | #28 | |
Second Lieutenant
568
Rep 276
Posts |
Quote:
One thing i forgot to mention was the brake pedal feel . The M2 has a firmer pedal the M2C is softer and has more travel. I like a brake pedal that feels like stepping on a brick. After the pads seat I'll pressure bleed with SRF, it may help. carl |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2018, 07:52 PM | #29 | |
Private First Class
205
Rep 189
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
ChrisK4449.00 |
08-26-2018, 11:25 PM | #30 |
Major General
7334
Rep 7,298
Posts |
All BMW manuals suck especially into 2nd gear, requiring that pause / 2nd motion you mention. Supposedly the F8x gearbox is one of the least recalcitrant they have made in this regard. I know what you mean though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2018, 03:34 AM | #31 |
Lieutenant
377
Rep 596
Posts |
The N55 doesn't have more low down torque than the S55, even in the M2C state of tune. It may just feel like it because the N55 runs out of breath so much sooner that the low down torque is the highlight of its power band. The S55 is better everywhere in this regard.
There also seems to be an expectation that bigger brakes = more stopping power. They just handle heat better than a smaller kit and have better pad wear characteristics. The smaller kit is capable of generating the same amount of stopping power on the first few stops before fade would set in. |
Appreciate
2
cptobvious2531.50 mikeahso411.50 |
08-27-2018, 04:02 AM | #32 | ||
Colonel
4399
Rep 2,856
Posts
Drives: BMW M2 CSL Turbomeister
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Travelling / Managing / Writing
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now let's tune that thing and we will be in for a lot of fun! Such a f**king pity we have to do it and BMW didn't decide to make it decent from the get go. MR |
||
Appreciate
1
KevM2723.50 |
08-27-2018, 05:17 AM | #34 | |
Major General
4449
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: '19 M2C
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
I also hate to say this, but so far these cars have all been MT. I am also a previous M2 owner, so it will be fun to compare.
__________________
www.ReTuneTheDeTune.com
2019 M2 Competition (Sunset Orange) |
|
Appreciate
1
Davil6524.50 |
08-27-2018, 05:46 AM | #35 | |
Banned
1287
Rep 1,675
Posts |
Quote:
Thx for the review, Why did the dealership let you drive the traded in m2 around? This threads gonna make for alot of s55 fanboy salt |
|
Appreciate
2
cptobvious2531.50 AESZ4198.00 |
08-27-2018, 06:33 AM | #36 | |
Gone Fishin’
7318
Rep 12,125
Posts |
Quote:
If you want salt start talking about exhaust note |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2018, 06:43 AM | #37 |
Brigadier General
6525
Rep 3,072
Posts
Drives: M2 CS, 18 Vantage AMR, 00 WRX
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Australia
|
FFS. Some guy has 150 miles on the odo and does a back to back comparison. I wasn’t going to say anything but questioning why I even read some of this shit now. All I like is is the pics while I wait. Must refrain from reading.
|
Appreciate
1
DrKevM52273.50 |
08-27-2018, 06:46 AM | #38 |
Gone Fishin’
7318
Rep 12,125
Posts |
Yeah calling it sluggish during break in is a bit
|
08-27-2018, 06:49 AM | #39 |
Colonel
4975
Rep 2,268
Posts |
OP: do you regret your decision? I guess you need to break in the car more but it sounds like the M2C is not instantly more thrilling...feeling solid isn't usually more entertaining!
__________________
don't read this. too late...
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2018, 06:55 AM | #40 |
First Lieutenant
171
Rep 324
Posts |
I'm a previous M2 owner. I think the M2C is the better choice for those who track their cars. But for most people the M2 will be good enough. In fact, the nimbleness and snappier feel that Carl described makes it more attractive to me.
|
Appreciate
1
10"4974.50 |
08-27-2018, 07:39 AM | #41 |
Banned
1287
Rep 1,675
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2018, 07:49 AM | #43 |
Banned
1287
Rep 1,675
Posts |
Slugish feel doesnt really have an affect on whether your in break in period or not.
All the break in period limits is that you dont go crazy wot and keep your revs under lets say 5k to be safe The sluggishness you would feel is in the lower band anyways, you wanna feel.quick pick up in a small coupe like this, not a 'boatish' feel Thata one thing where i picked tbe m2 over the m240i, is i liked the feel of the throttle and tbe responsiveness of the car, even in spongy comfort mode If your gonna dedicate the car to tracking alot than easy decision to go m2c, but how many ppl actually will do that consistently? No i have a feeling alot of ppl were thinking that they didnt have a 'proper' M car with the og m2. And were caught up in the hooplah of having bestest and newest. |
08-27-2018, 07:53 AM | #44 | |
Gone Fishin’
7318
Rep 12,125
Posts |
Quote:
The S55 has insane low end kick.... i have 40000+ miles driving one so I am more wondering why people are saying this. I even asked in another thread if they detuned the prespooling. |
|
Appreciate
2
ChrisK4449.00 cptobvious2531.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|