07-10-2023, 09:13 AM | #353 | |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,696
Posts |
Quote:
Altho, from previous logs I've noticed big cooling system requirement differences b/n tracks with 125-135mph top speeds and those with 145-155mph top speeds. I've also had the CSF setup perform fine with ambient <50F. So, b/n those and the other different variables bn the logs, I'm not drawing any conclusions. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2023, 02:19 PM | #354 |
Colonel
1207
Rep 2,026
Posts |
Doesn't make sense that you add that much radiator and aux cores and still can't keep coolant in check. Maybe more dedicated oil cooling would help. I don't see many other cars struggling this hard for temps...
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2023, 03:29 PM | #355 |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,696
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2023, 07:49 AM | #356 |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Reviewing those logs you sent, I have a hard time believing that the CSF products (outside of the intercooler) do anything, and might actually makes things worse.
In fact, I've seen 1 or 2 other users complain about higher temps since adding a CSF radiator.
__________________
Mods: Yes.
Last edited by AmuroRay; 07-11-2023 at 09:46 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2023, 11:02 AM | #358 |
Private First Class
237
Rep 184
Posts
Drives: 2017 BMW M3 Competition (LCII)
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
|
Hi, quickly chiming in here. My review was just on the basis of my own experience (experiencing slightly cooler temps all round), but not based on logs or data. The do88 cooler itself is of very good quality and fitment is on point; would recommend.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2023, 11:41 AM | #359 |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
I think I saw in another thread travel has you too busy to test. Have you had a chance to drive the car on the street with the parts fitted?
__________________
Mods: Yes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2023, 01:48 PM | #360 |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,696
Posts |
Haven’t. Getting a cpl other things done and told my shop to take their time in case other guys need to make a specific track day.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2023, 06:40 PM | #361 | ||||
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Went back in time and pulled OG Shark's log:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...8&postcount=29 Quote:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=38 Quote:
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/...th=6&year=2019 Pretty much the worst case possible in terms of weather: 18 minute session? 16-17PSI IAT maximum of 160F Oil temp a maximum of 259F Coolant temp maximum of 252F (note - I'm not entirely sure how to read "time" in BM3) Oil temps from 205F (time stamp 8.5) 1.2 minutes to 230F oil (time stamp 9.7) 3.25 minutes to 240F (timestamp 11.75) Coolant temps from 200F (time stamp 8.45) 3 minutes to 235F (time stamp 11.45) 4.45 minutes to 240F (time stamp 12.9) Quote:
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/...48502/historic Datalog Quote:
16 -17PSI IAT maximum of 153F Oil temp a maximum of 259F Coolant temp maximum of 241F (Oil temps from 205F (time stamp .62 minutes) .95 minutes to 230F Oil (time stamp 1.57 minutes) 1.38 minutes to 240F oil (time stamp 2 minutes) Coolant temps from 200F (time stamp .96) 3.54 minutes to 235F (time stamp 4.5) 5.84 minutes to 240F (time stamp 6.8)
__________________
Mods: Yes.
Last edited by AmuroRay; 08-15-2023 at 08:19 PM.. |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2023, 08:30 PM | #362 |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
If you know how I should interpret the BM3 "time", please let me know and I will update.
Different tracks, and different days - nearly the same state of tune, and similar mods. Car 1 (OG Shark) showed better resistance to oil temps despite the day being 10F hotter. Could it be that the DO88 does allow more effective heat dissipation despite a thermostat that opens later? Car 2 (M2guru) Showed better resistance to coolant temps, despite having a stock coolant system. Could Max cooling really add that much headroom? It should be noted that Car 1 peak speeds are 10mph less than car 2.
__________________
Mods: Yes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 04:48 AM | #363 | |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
Quote:
As I have my bumper cover off waiting for the oil cooler to arrive, I have straightened the radiator fins out which I have to say will increase flow by 5-15% - they were pretty bent up. BUT WORSE is the aux coolant radiator. That thing is nearly blocked of all air flow due to the bent fins. The fins are much smaller on the aux radiator. I have "cleaned up" two rows (vertical) by pushing a probe through from the rear side, but the probe is a bit too large (good for the primary radiator, but not as good for the aux). I cannot fit the probe between every fin - have to go every other. I think that even it I cannot find a smaller probe (will look tonight), it still has to be better to air moving through it than around it even if I have "reduced" the number of fins by collapsing every other. I plan to look up prices for the aux radiator it's so bad... I am starting to be concerned that I have made too many changes and won't know which had the largest impact: CSF to d088 oil cooler, straightening radiator fins, and straightening the aux radiator fins. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 05:10 AM | #364 |
Major General
7252
Rep 7,429
Posts |
Just wanted to add something. The m2 doesn't have the aux radiator pump like the m235i, and you technically can't just retrofit that aux pump because the car cannot control it, and coding cannot enable it. However, I talked to Enabled about this and he believes he can enable the aux water pump via DME tuning, by porting over the controls from the M235i. So if you guys want to give it ago and have like stock DME controlled aux waterpump to help that aux radiator out, then I think it is doable. You just need to retrofit the parts, and talk to Enabled to get the tuning done.
__________________
Click on the link below to see a compiled list of every review I have ever written:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...2#post30368242 |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 06:49 AM | #365 | |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 07:59 AM | #366 | |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Quote:
use this instead - for high density fin packs. you'll have to measure the fins per inc though. Your coolant temperatures were fine though, max cool combined with the lower temp thermostat kept you at 242F? maximum, which is great considering you have done zero work on the coolant side. My theory is the oil's increased headroom is helping keep the coolant side happy. I would personally see how the oil cooler alone does before doing anything else.
__________________
Mods: Yes.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 08:26 AM | #367 | |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 08:39 AM | #368 | |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,696
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
AmuroRay2282.50 |
08-16-2023, 08:43 AM | #369 |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 09:01 AM | #370 | |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Mods: Yes.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 09:13 AM | #371 |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
Did the radiator over three days. The aux cooler...I am still not sure if I will continue or find a thinner tool to try. Either way...I'll probably continue. When it get's bad again...I'll be upgrading.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 09:15 AM | #372 |
Lieutenant
384
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2017
Location: St. Paul MN
|
One other thing...It doesn't seem possible to straighten the fins of the CSF intercooler. They seem offset front to back. And the fins are not the same thin aluminum as the factory pieces (mine is painted?/anodized? black which may also impact the stiffness). For my IATs...I am thinking that the intercooler is a disposable item - it seems packed with bugs and sand/rocks. Money wants to jump out of my pockets it seems...
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2023, 09:41 AM | #373 | |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,696
Posts |
Quote:
But, as I said in your other thread, once you solve the IAT problem, the added power will make the oil & coolant temp problem even worse. The goal we’re both working towards is what is the right combo of hardware (and tune) that will balance & control temps in all the systems on hot track days, and we still need more experimenting and data. I may be able to get to the track next week, we’ll see! |
|
08-16-2023, 10:35 AM | #374 | |
Brigadier General
2283
Rep 4,146
Posts |
Honestly, if you're upgrading I would do the VRSF Race or MAD race - you'll need the M235i Cross reinforcement though. While it's out, wrap the charge pipe with reflective tape (use something high quality) and you can even add it to parts of the intercooler.
Finally, you should consider a freer flowing inlet/intake (lowers WGDC, turbo heat, and IATs as a whole) and/or wrapping your box with the reflective tape. Check Jeremyman's review of the the M2 airbox with an open intake:. https://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1765289 I'll also note that there is a member here with a front mounted intake that noted a a substantial reduction in IATs: https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1944685 Quote:
__________________
Mods: Yes.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|