03-28-2019, 12:53 PM | #1 | |
Private NumNuts
521
Rep 321
Posts |
Fabspeed argues you can lose power going catless
Fabspeed argues going catless is not always necessary and you can lose power compared to sport cats on modern platforms such as McLaren, Porsche, Ferrari, etc.
Interesting article I read on B-O-O-S-T-A-D-D-I-C-T.c-o-m. Here's an excerpt from article: "The conventional thinking is that going catless (ditching your catalytic converters) is best for power. That traditionally was the case but modern motors adjust so many parameters so quickly and are built for such efficiency that you can actually lose power by getting rid of the cats. Frankly, with German HJS 200 CPSI catalytic converters or sport cats you can have 93% of the flow of going catless. That means there is truth to Fabspeed's argument. Fabspeed makes a good argument especially in relation to McLaren platforms: Quote:
The cat bypass pipes made a little more power but less torque and the ECU seemed to struggled a bit down low with the bypass pipes. A CEL (check engine light) without cats is inevitable and at that point you likely are losing power on the factory tune if the car isn't triggering various limp modes. Ideally, you want a tune to take advantage of the pipes whether running straight pipes or sport cats but the advantage of going catless is not what it once was. You also can lose power if not properly tuned and on the factory tune while triggering a CEL."
__________________
|
|
03-28-2019, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Brigadier General
3277
Rep 3,255
Posts |
Yeah I 100% agree. CEL means the computer thinks something is wrong and thus will attempt to protect itself and change engine parameters. What parameters are changed will vary from car to car. So, if you go catless you definitely want something to fool the ECU into thinking that everything is in place and working properly, thus eliminating the CEL.
Now for the unpopular part which comes from personal experience and admitted bias. I think EVERY car should have a cat and catless shouldn't be an option for street cars. As someone who grew up in LA in the 80s I can definitely see the positive impact of stronger emission laws. Just ask anyone that lived in So Cal for an extended period of time. Furthermore, I had asthma problems especially when growing up, clean air is extremely important to me. I like having the ability to go for a run outside without having to suck down a bunch of exhaust fumes while working out. But, I also value performance as I like to tune my cars. I've always bought high flow cats (had the fabspeed sport cat on previous car) but to me this seems like a good balance between not being too damaging to the environment but also getting to eat my cake too. Hypocritical - yes, but it's a balance that I can live with. Edit: Worth noting that the Fabspeed sport cat is of extremely high quality. I got pulled over and had to go to CA state referee for inspection. The car passed a rolling CA emission test at 25 and 35mph with the Fabspeed sport cat installed. |
03-28-2019, 11:42 PM | #3 |
on restriction from buying more cars
239
Rep 184
Posts |
^ agree 100%. I remeber stage 1 smog alerts where we weren’t allowed to play outside. Even staying indoors on those days, my lungs would burn with a deep breath. Seeing the San Gabriel mountains was rare due to the haze. It’s so much better now thanks to modern emissions controls.
I even dislike catless on track cars. I’ve gotten pretty nauseous being stuck behind a row of cars for several laps under caution, while they towed a car off track. |
03-30-2019, 12:33 PM | #4 |
Private First Class
63
Rep 130
Posts |
iirc back when I had my old mkiv Jetta in 2005-2006 there were people reporting loss of hp/torque going from stock to 3+in downpipes (with or without cats) due to a loss of back pressure. Even tuned. The sweet spot seemed to be 2.5in downpipes on a stock turbo.
In fact I've read my mkvii Golf R that I commute with gains little to nothing from a downpipe in many cases because the stock system is pretty decent being a performance car. The changes to the downpipe and exhaust are mostly acoustic and weight saving. I would imagine that the pipe diameters on performance cars these days are close out of the factory. The main difference being a restrictive cat due to regulations : . I can see a similar to stock size and a high flow cat being the best way to go. IMO |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2019, 11:57 PM | #5 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
24083
Rep 190,614
Posts |
Interesting read, its worth noting that not all cats are equal.
A high quality cat will provide the same advantages as the catless without any of its disadvantages
__________________
Check out our current sale by clicking on this link!
https://x-ph.com/sale/ Phone number 702-494-9435 |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|