11-17-2018, 01:44 PM | #67 |
Private First Class
69
Rep 116
Posts |
FL5 in M2C square fitments would be super!
|
Appreciate
2
Proctor750426.00 Old Geezer204.00 |
11-22-2018, 11:52 AM | #68 |
Private First Class
204
Rep 189
Posts |
I think the problem is as much height as it is width. The base car can run more tire (i.e. wider) since 18s are shorter. The anecdotal evidence suggests that a 265/35-19 in front is near the maximum one can run. Some people report rubbing; others do not. And that’s on stock suspension; lowering would make the problem worse. I’m not sure people who might otherwise prefer a square setup would consider a 265 enough tire in the back. A 30-series 19” tire might provide some options, but nobody makes a 30-series 19 in a 200tw.
|
Appreciate
1
Proctor750426.00 |
11-22-2018, 01:08 PM | #69 | |
Lieutenant
426
Rep 538
Posts |
Quote:
Wonder what the max rear would be then? It looks like Im stuck with the 788s until apex and others develop some good 19" options. Im not one to baloon tires that are too wide for the wheel. Really dont want to have to go aftermarket bbk just to fit 18s but maybe thats the only alternative. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2018, 09:39 AM | #71 |
Major
1123
Rep 1,083
Posts |
For M2C, if we want wheels that can clear the brakes we can technically run SM-10 19x9 ET30, 18x10 ET33 ? Do you think 255/35/19 and 275/35/18 tires would clear stock suspension?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2018, 12:35 PM | #72 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
Quote:
--Dylan
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
|
Appreciate
1
ashtaron141123.00 |
12-21-2018, 09:28 AM | #73 | |
Major
1123
Rep 1,083
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2018, 01:55 PM | #74 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
Quote:
--Dylan
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
|
Appreciate
1
ashtaron141123.00 |
12-22-2018, 03:09 PM | #76 |
Second Lieutenant
225
Rep 243
Posts
Drives: 2018 MGM 6MT M2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rockville, Maryland
|
Still planning on 19" FL-5's?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-23-2019, 11:43 AM | #78 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
While 19" FL-5 production has not been planned just yet, we might consider a production later in the year.
There is nothing set in stone at this time. We will keep the community updated if anything changes! - Max
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
Appreciate
1
randyt224.50 |
01-31-2019, 06:01 PM | #81 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
Unfortunately, we do not have any immediate plans for a 19" FL-5. We do have some 19" EC-7 fitments in the works, specifically for the M2 Competition. Here are a few fitments we offer now that will work quite well: SM-10 ONLY: Front: 19x9" ET30 - 245/35-19 Rear: 19x11" ET44 - 295/30-19
Front: 19x9.5" ET22 - 265/30-19 Rear: 19x11" ET44 - 295/30-19
SM-10, EC-7 or ARC-8: Front & Rear: 19x9.5" ET22 - 265/30-19
SM-10 & EC-7: Front: 19x9.5" ET22 - 265/30-19 Rear: 18x11" ET44 - 285/35-18 (See photo below)
ARC-8 ONLY: Front & Rear: 19x9.5" ET33 - 265/30-19 (see photo below)
This should shed some light on what our current recommendations are for the M2 Competition! - Max
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
Appreciate
0
|
01-31-2019, 09:19 PM | #82 |
Major
1123
Rep 1,083
Posts |
Would there be a staggered 19" EC-7 fitment?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2019, 10:56 AM | #84 |
Lieutenant
426
Rep 538
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2019, 11:38 AM | #85 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
That is the plan, we are planning to mirror our 18" fitment, which is 9.5" ET28 and 10.5" ET40.
It would, however the tires would be a bit stretched. We recommend 265/30-19 tires on the 18x9.5" ET22 as well as front and rear negative camber. With 245/35-19 tires, I'd use the 19x9" ET30 SM-10 instead, which will be a direct fit with no modifications required. Quote:
--Dylan
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
|
Appreciate
1
Proctor750426.00 |
02-02-2019, 08:54 AM | #86 |
Second Lieutenant
225
Rep 243
Posts
Drives: 2018 MGM 6MT M2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rockville, Maryland
|
I'm sad to hear no 19" FL-5 for at least the near term but thanks for letting us know not to expect it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2019, 07:14 PM | #87 |
Registered
6
Rep 15
Posts |
Which offset to get??
Apex,
I'm looking at the SM-10s in 18x9.5" (primarily track wheels). Does the wheel sit in the same position to the fender with either offset, and only the concavity is different? Which offset is recommended? I'd be ok using some smallish spacers--would that then require the use of wheel studs? Want to get in on today's group buy...
__________________
2016 M2 | Alpine White | Executive Pkg.| M Performance Parts | TC Kline Camber Plates |
Appreciate
0
|
02-13-2019, 11:36 AM | #88 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3511
Rep 6,731
Posts |
Quote:
For a square 18" setup, we recommend the 18x9.5" ET28 FL-5 with 265/35-18 tires. This setup requires slight front negative camber, but is otherwise a direct fit, and was developed specifically for the M2. --Dylan
__________________
925-245-0773 /// info@apexraceparts.com
Wheels /// Accessories /// Vehicle-Specific Fitment Guides /// Careers |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|