BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
M2 Technical Topics > N55 Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust / Bolt-ons / Tuning > BM3 Log CSF/Evo DP

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-21-2019, 09:51 PM   #1
nismoman
Private
40
Rep
78
Posts

Drives: 2017 LBBM2,2001 LSB M3,S52 E30
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntersville, NC

iTrader: (0)

BM3 Log CSF/Evo DP

Thoughts on this log would be appreciated. 2017 6spd m2, Installed Injen Intake, CSF Intercooler and Evolution race-werks catless down pipe, stage 2 93 octane ots, with the stock muffler. I'm assuming I just paste the share the web
link address? Thanks for the input

http://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=5ce4ae72c090c67dfdca5e7b
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2019, 01:30 AM   #2
Pray for Mojo
Major
Canada
430
Rep
1,115
Posts

Drives: 2014 M235i & 2018 X3 M40i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary

iTrader: (0)

Looks like the HPFP was struggling to keep up, your gas looked ok in the first gear but once the pump started lagging your timing went to shit. Was the car hesitating or stuttering at all?
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2019, 07:24 AM   #3
nismoman
Private
40
Rep
78
Posts

Drives: 2017 LBBM2,2001 LSB M3,S52 E30
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntersville, NC

iTrader: (0)

Not really, felt normal through the pull. What is the normal ish timing advance number for a healthy pull
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2019, 09:28 AM   #4
Cornally
New Member
20
Rep
25
Posts

Drives: '18 BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: NE

iTrader: (0)

Not to thread-jack, but, does it make sense in a scenario like this to back down to the stage 1 93 ots map or stage 2 91 ots? I'm wondering which map strikes a better balance of performance vs. taxing the hpfp.
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2019, 10:20 AM   #5
cecaa850
Captain
United_States
259
Rep
699
Posts

Drives: 2018 M2
Join Date: May 2018
Location: South East TX.

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornally View Post
Not to thread-jack, but, does it make sense in a scenario like this to back down to the stage 1 93 ots map or stage 2 91 ots? I'm wondering which map strikes a better balance of performance vs. taxing the hpfp.
Great question. I would be interested in this as well.
Appreciate 0
      05-22-2019, 02:31 PM   #6
Pray for Mojo
Major
Canada
430
Rep
1,115
Posts

Drives: 2014 M235i & 2018 X3 M40i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary

iTrader: (0)

Usually it's only the E30 tune that taxes the HPFP, not sure why the OP's pump was struggling a bit, could be a one off tank of gas. I run the 91 OTS because it doesn't seem as sensitive to gasoline quality and I'm only sacrificing 10-15hp.

Clean log should look like this, this is M235i Stage 2 91 OTS. Timing is nice and even all the way up, around 6,000rpm should be 10 or 11.
http://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=5baadd37d10b435c56a38457
Appreciate 1
      05-22-2019, 10:05 PM   #7
nismoman
Private
40
Rep
78
Posts

Drives: 2017 LBBM2,2001 LSB M3,S52 E30
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntersville, NC

iTrader: (0)

Thanks. It was definitely fuel quality, That was a no name mobil station 93. I had roughly half a tank today and filled up with shell 93 and dumped a can of vp octane booster and everything cleared up big time. Pulled like a freight train! I'll post the log from tonight in another thread so people can see how it affects timing. Thanks for the help.
Appreciate 0
      05-23-2019, 08:25 PM   #8
Anthony1s
Banned
756
Rep
2,149
Posts

Drives: 2018 Mineral Grey M2
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pennsylvania

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pray for Mojo View Post
Usually it's only the E30 tune that taxes the HPFP, not sure why the OP's pump was struggling a bit, could be a one off tank of gas. I run the 91 OTS because it doesn't seem as sensitive to gasoline quality and I'm only sacrificing 10-15hp.

Clean log should look like this, this is M235i Stage 2 91 OTS. Timing is nice and even all the way up, around 6,000rpm should be 10 or 11.
http://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=5baadd37d10b435c56a38457
What happened to cause your timing to jump to 36 at the end? Is that the exhaust burbles coming on?
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 09:47 AM   #9
Happy Motoring
Lieutenant
Happy Motoring's Avatar
United_States
474
Rep
449
Posts

Drives: OG M2
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW M2  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pray for Mojo View Post
Usually it's only the E30 tune that taxes the HPFP, not sure why the OP's pump was struggling a bit, could be a one off tank of gas. I run the 91 OTS because it doesn't seem as sensitive to gasoline quality and I'm only sacrificing 10-15hp.

Clean log should look like this, this is M235i Stage 2 91 OTS. Timing is nice and even all the way up, around 6,000rpm should be 10 or 11.
http://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=5baadd37d10b435c56a38457
I don't know how bad or good the gas in Canada is but with people experiencing knock issues based on octane, I think I'll follow you and do 91 octane ots to play it safe.
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 10:39 AM   #10
digimattic
Private
digimattic's Avatar
37
Rep
74
Posts

Drives: 2017 6MT LBB M2
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Motoring View Post
I don't know how bad or good the gas in Canada is but with people experiencing knock issues based on octane, I think I'll follow you and do 91 octane ots to play it safe.
Our gas (at least in Toronto) seems pretty good! I have had no issues with Esso (ExxonMobil)'s 93 Octane or PetroCanada's 94 Octane. My M2 is not tuned, but had a WRX pro-tuned for 94 and never had an issue with a bad tank.
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 10:47 AM   #11
Happy Motoring
Lieutenant
Happy Motoring's Avatar
United_States
474
Rep
449
Posts

Drives: OG M2
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW M2  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by digimattic View Post
Our gas (at least in Toronto) seems pretty good! I have had no issues with Esso (ExxonMobil)'s 93 Octane or PetroCanada's 94 Octane. My M2 is not tuned, but had a WRX pro-tuned for 94 and never had an issue with a bad tank.
Considering M2 from factory is able to take 91 octane I'm sure nobody will notice a difference but it seems with BM3 it is really finicky.
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 12:50 PM   #12
Pray for Mojo
Major
Canada
430
Rep
1,115
Posts

Drives: 2014 M235i & 2018 X3 M40i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by digimattic View Post
Our gas (at least in Toronto) seems pretty good! I have had no issues with Esso (ExxonMobil)'s 93 Octane or PetroCanada's 94 Octane. My M2 is not tuned, but had a WRX pro-tuned for 94 and never had an issue with a bad tank.
You really don't have any idea if the gas is good unless you're logging. The cars are made to run on almost any "premium" gas seen worldwide. The DME will adapt and make less power on poor quality fuel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Motoring View Post
I don't know how bad or good the gas in Canada is but with people experiencing knock issues based on octane, I think I'll follow you and do 91 octane ots to play it safe.
You might have better luck with TX 93, but here our "94" won't even run OTS 91 with clean timing. We have similar fuel quality to California/West Coast.
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 01:30 PM   #13
digimattic
Private
digimattic's Avatar
37
Rep
74
Posts

Drives: 2017 6MT LBB M2
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pray for Mojo View Post
You really don't have any idea if the gas is good unless you're logging. The cars are made to run on almost any "premium" gas seen worldwide. The DME will adapt and make less power on poor quality fuel.



You might have better luck with TX 93, but here our "94" won't even run OTS 91 with clean timing. We have similar fuel quality to California/West Coast.
Noted. Would the Torque Pro app be sufficient to start logging it? the BM3 logs look like they're measuring timing on all six cylinders?
Appreciate 0
      05-24-2019, 06:55 PM   #14
Nezil
Major
Nezil's Avatar
1403
Rep
1,466
Posts

Drives: LCI '18 6MT M2
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Motoring View Post
Considering M2 from factory is able to take 91 octane I'm sure nobody will notice a difference but it seems with BM3 it is really finicky.
It's not that BM3 is finicky, it's that the CA 91 octane is truly awful!

As others have said, the M2 from factory will run on 91 octane, but it won't run correctly as intended; even more so if it's hot outside with its woefully inadequate factory FMIC.

Take logs on the stock map and you'll see timing pull all over the place.

I'd actually hazard a guess that if a BMW DME engineer were to look at the logs with the CA 91 fuel, he'd be very surprised, and not in a good way. I very much doubt they've ever had engineers test CA fuel.

I know BMW has staff all over the globe, but I work for a large company that sells product internationally. If there is a problem in a region, we might send some engineers there to investigate, but if there isn't a problem, 95% of the engineering work goes on wherever 'home' is - Germany obviously for BMW.
__________________
2018 ///M2 LCI, LBB, 6MT...

Current Performance Mods:
CSF FMIC, ER CP, Fabspeed Cat, Aquamist WMI, GFB DV+, NGK 97506, BM3 (Stage 2 93 OTS), CDV delete, UCP, M2C/M3/M4 Strut Brace, M3/M4 Reinforcement Rings
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.




m2
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST