05-14-2021, 01:03 PM | #67 |
New Member
9
Rep 7
Posts
Drives: BMW M2C AW
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Colorado
|
OP aint coming back. He didn't get the same numbers or anywhere near the same numbers. Otherwise he would be in here posting his results.
|
Appreciate
2
Throttlemonkey26.00 MDuckie96.00 |
05-17-2021, 03:49 PM | #68 |
Colonel
5613
Rep 2,316
Posts |
Come on man! What are the real numbers?
__________________
Present: 2023 M2 BSM W/Carbon everything, 6 Speed
Past:2020 M2C HS Executive, 6 Speed |
Appreciate
0
|
05-17-2021, 07:47 PM | #69 |
your average JAMF
3173
Rep 4,106
Posts
Drives: '21 M2 Comp, '19 Golf R
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cochise County, AZ
|
Rumor has it that he spun his crank hub on the dyno, then traded it in on a new Veloster.
__________________
'21 M2 Comp
'19 Golf R |
Appreciate
0
|
05-18-2021, 08:04 PM | #71 |
New Member
35
Rep 13
Posts |
OP is trying to learn photoshop to change the tq graph line.
It’s amazing how much humility people. It’s okay to be wrong and admit you were wrong. |
Appreciate
2
Multimodal2896.00 rogeroger73.00 |
05-19-2021, 02:16 AM | #72 |
Major General
3492
Rep 9,709
Posts |
It sounded to me like the OP trusted the figures from the dyno run. That's a reasonable stance for someone that knows no better. After all, the evidence he had pointed to a clean run.
No different to the masses that believe BMW under rate because of phoney over reading dyno brands popular in some parts. : |
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2021, 02:25 AM | #73 |
Lieutenant
779
Rep 420
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2021, 09:11 AM | #74 | |
Lieutenant
653
Rep 506
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2021, 02:05 PM | #75 | ||
Major General
3492
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2021, 02:09 PM | #76 | ||||
Enlisted Member
26
Rep 34
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Please not again You can confidently say a healthy stock M2c will make somewhere in the region of 405bhp-420bhp CRANK dependant on air temperature/density, fuel quality etc. Anything outside of that and common sense would have you question how accurate that specific dyno is. Stating 430bhp at the wheels sounds a bit silly. Dyno's should be used as a tuning tool but even then I believe it affects the credibility of tuning companies using inflated numbers from their rigs. These guys have a great reputation in the UK and also happens to dyno a M2c. |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2021, 03:27 PM | #77 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
2485
Rep 1,602
Posts |
Quote:
Depending on where you are that may or may not be exactly representative of what you've got. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2021, 04:17 AM | #78 | |
Lieutenant
779
Rep 420
Posts |
Quote:
430 at the wheels is telling me the dude has absolutely no clue what he is talking about. No wonder with that nickname tbh. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2021, 10:24 PM | #79 |
Major
669
Rep 1,074
Posts |
Things got busy for me and never made it. You all have many jokes and all are much comedians. Dyno will be tomorrow morning same time and looking like the same temp as last run. Tomorrow everyone will have the aa midpipe numbers difference
But like I stated before. I could dyno every dyno in my state same results and everyone here would have something smart to say. Engines are made within tolerance. The tighter the tolerance in moving parts the different the output. This is why many companies over rate or under rate. That way they are within tolerance. And first special on the dyno. Post was meant for the baseline and power difference. For the ones who are here for the AA midpipe difference which was the origins of this post thank you as I'll post the results for anyone interested around noon. Eastern guys will see it a few hours later. I apologize for the hold up but car sounds amazing !!
__________________
Instagram: M2_Medusa
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 01:24 AM | #80 | |
Enlisted Member
26
Rep 34
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 03:13 AM | #81 | |
Lieutenant
779
Rep 420
Posts |
Quote:
Being the first "special content" edition means the same as being the 10000th M2C. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 03:16 AM | #82 | |
Lieutenant
779
Rep 420
Posts |
Quote:
And tolerances are relevant for a couple of hp here and there. 430whp is NEVER achievable on an M2C with just tolerances. It would have to be intentional, which we by now know it isn't the case. The fact you assume it is shows how little you know and how late to the party you are. With this said, I will be silent until we see some dragy times corrected (both ways) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 10:10 AM | #84 |
Major General
5869
Rep 6,638
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 12:27 PM | #85 |
Major
669
Rep 1,074
Posts |
Finished up at sheepy race this morning.
Total of 3 runs! 1st off extremely impressed with the consistency of the WHP on all 3 runs with the midpipe compared to without. The WHP of my first 3 runs last month was 412whp with an average of 499wtq between the 3 runs. With the new midpipe the hp was more consistent and averaged 411whp between the 3 runs and the torque averaged 494wtq. So I lost about 5wtq with the midpipe which was to be expected and hp stayed relatively the same within tolerance only loss of 1whp but many factors are at play obv a month apart. I have attached the 2 runs as I didn't take a photo of the 1st run which was my lowest. Run 1: 410whp, 491wtq Run 2: 411whp, 504wtq Run 3: 413whp, 488wtq Loss of 5wtq with the new midpipe but that's to be expected on a stock car. The small loss in torque is well worth the purchase as the sound is incredible on a dyno. Which translates to how it may sound to others on real road conditions. Incredible *** Note *** Since last run I've added 10mm wheel spacers on the rear don't know if this makes a difference. Maybe Whp without the spacers would have been +3 on average from last months run. Regardless those in the market will lose a small amount of torque but you won't even be able to tell. Placebo will probably make it feel faster with how much louder and aggressive the exhaust note is. Up next: I will be doing a CSF front and top mount on the stock tune and report back with the numbers. Stay tuned (:
__________________
Instagram: M2_Medusa
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 01:30 PM | #86 | |
your average JAMF
3173
Rep 4,106
Posts
Drives: '21 M2 Comp, '19 Golf R
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cochise County, AZ
|
Quote:
__________________
'21 M2 Comp
'19 Golf R |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 02:24 PM | #87 |
Major
669
Rep 1,074
Posts |
You mean the m2 comp with e85 in the tank? Yeah 430 seems about right with a few gallons of e85. Enough to keep trims happy. It's been documented many cars putting 423-430 with e85 stock
__________________
Instagram: M2_Medusa
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2021, 02:28 PM | #88 | |
Major
669
Rep 1,074
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: M2_Medusa
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|