Thread: Which tuner?
View Single Post
      02-19-2021, 02:13 AM   #21
cookiesowns
;)
cookiesowns's Avatar
587
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: X5 45e, 535i N54, X3 N55
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by F87source View Post
+1 mm intake lift, 2-3° of intake cam duration extra, if that helps.
+1mm of lift and 2-3 degrees of duration is enough to cause valve contact in some motors.. the question is how close are we, and will there be contact without tuning?

Cause if not, what would the tuning get you if you're already at the maximum amount of flow with the MILVS in place and stock valvetronic tables other than maximizing BSFC, and making sure we're still within limits of MBT

Unless somehow there's a calibration process for the DME to know the now new maximum amount of valve lift, which is usually capped to around 9.7mm, but if it's a mechanical change, and there's really no direct position sensor other than eccentric shaft positioning, i'm not sure how that's the case, and a 9.7mm target would now be 10.7mm again, assuming it's a linear change.

I'm going to have to wager that most of the tuning is simply just increasing torque demand appropriately to take advantage of the additional valve lift, and flow benefits of the duration, while making sure injection windows are still within optimal range.

Given that if @yourtuner is tuning with torque in mind, more airflow = more torque, thus the car will target less boost to achieve the same torque demand., meaning raise torque barring ignition timings the same = more boost = moar power, which is where your gains are.

That said, I'm game if someone is game Maybe have to poke @-Edios to do it..

Sorry for hijacking your @fgc7533
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue

Last edited by cookiesowns; 02-19-2021 at 02:21 AM..
Appreciate 0