Quote:
Originally Posted by flybigjet
Quote:
Originally Posted by akkando
Lighter is HUGE deal.
|
I agree it's a huge deal (lighter is *always* better)-- my point was that BMW did a lot more *specifically* to the CSL. On the CS, it seems it was more "flash the motor and raid the parts bin for CF to make the car lighter".
Maybe that means that the M2C is just so good out of the box that all BMW could do to improve it was a mild flash, an MP suspension and go nuts with CF?
I just meant that I feel that BMW did more change work to the CSL than the CS-- hence the longer list of different parts M3/CSL v. M2C/CS.
R. |
I agree. I assume it's not worth the development cost at time to do a CSL. Also they may want the next CSL to be on the m3/m4 platform because it's more the flagship model. The m2 is the right size though.