View Single Post
      12-15-2018, 06:41 AM   #37
JWMII
Private
United_States
47
Rep
96
Posts

Drives: M2C, GLE53, GLA 250
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: NOVA

iTrader: (0)

To each his own

Quote:
Originally Posted by FSU_Logan View Post
I really doubt cost is the issue when we're driving 65k cars, but moreover the unnecessary application of the film for most of us as most will not track the car. Ceramic coat the car for $250 and unless it's a big ass rock, it'll be fine.
Clearly this topic is a matter of perspective. I agree that if you can afford $65k on a car, $3k for PPF is not an issue. For me, the PPF is worth the money because I want to preserve the original paint. I have zero intentions on giving this car back or trading in in a few years. Preserving the original paint from damage is not something ceramic coating can do. My 135i was banged up up front after a few years and that's not going to happen with this car. I can't see having to trust a paint shop to perfectly match the HS repainting for rock chips. If that's your cup of tea, have at it.
Appreciate 0