Quote:
Originally Posted by scottomfg
So, to answer some of my own questions here are some comparisons of size, weight, and power between F87 M2 and both F80 M3 and F82 M4. All of this info is direct from BMW, weights are BMW-stated curb weights for US--all are with manual transmissions because who cares about anything else? 
Code:
M2 M4 Dif
Weight 3450 3530 M2 is 80lbs (2%) lighter
Height 55.5 54.4 M4 is 1.1in (2%) lower
Wheelbase 106 110.7 M2 is 4.7in (4%) shorter
Length 176.2 183.9 M2 is 7.7in (4%) shorter
Width 73 73.6 M4 is .6in (1%) wider
Power 365 425 M4 has 60hp (16%) advantage
Torque 343 406 M4 has 63lb-ft (18%) advantage
Code:
M2 M3 Dif
Weight 3450 3540 M2 is 90lbs (2%) lighter
Height 55.5 56.3 M2 is 1.1in (1%) lower
Wheelbase 106 110.7 M2 is 4.7in (4%) shorter
Length 176.2 183.9 M2 is 7.7in (4%) shorter
Width 73 73.9 M3 is .9in (1%) wider
Power 365 425 M3 has 60hp (16%) advantage
Torque 343 406 M3 has 63lb-ft (18%) advantage
Anyway, these numbers, as well as my other gripes in my previous post pretty much have me looking at an M3 instead of an M2. Outside of costing a lot more, doesn't seem like there are really any compromises going with the M3, and much gained. |
The 7 less inches in length makes a difference, especially when you drive them back-to-back or put them side-by-side, as I did with the M235i. The M2 looks stockier, more aggressive, is more nimble, and takes up less space. So there are 2 primary considerations: (1) smaller car and (2) at least $15K price difference.
There is definitely a lot gained for that $15K for the M3. I'm still indecisive too...
I am more drawn to the M3, but the M2 just feels so "young and fun" like every day and every drive will be a hoot. Lastly...the M2 rear fenders are so good!