[Nezil]

Originally Posted by trey100

But if your 0-30 would have been 1.8-2 seconds, you'd have a phenomenal 0-60 time. So why blame the delay rather than the poor 0-30? I feel the delay, trust me, but it is not 2 seconds. If it were 2 seconds and your 0-30 time is 2.5, that is 4.5 seconds right there. 0-60 would be 6.5+. So is there a delay, sure, but I find It to be minor in sport plus with fast shifts, maybe 50% of the time.

Check out my logs in the Lag between shifts thread I started... I don't mean that the delay costs you 2 seconds in 0-60, rather that the WG behaviour is delayed for 2 seconds. It does close 80% after the shift, so it costs you maybe 0.4 ~ 0.5 seconds tops.

Shifting faster is quicker overall, but the delay is from the time you come off the gas not from the time you get back on it after the shift. Shifting quicker therefore makes the delayed waste gate behaviour more apparent because it happens for longer after you're back on the gas. It's quicker because you loose less boost if you shift quickly.

On the N55 and probably S55, shifting quickly above 6,500 masks the delayed waste gate behaviour because less boost is lost and it rises quickly to the point at which 80% WGDC would be correct anyway. The delayed waste gate behaviour is still there, but it's masked.