Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelse92
Lol hoping to be there next year!
285 Stone's I could easily see fitting square o the M2, just really not sure how to cram the 295 Yoko up front. If it can be done though the car honestly might be too good.
My e92 right now doesn't work right with the current setup still so needs more time/testing to get it right. Maybe I'll run it in STUL or something still this year but Pax is an uphill battle in L3. Plus, it's too under-tired on 265's Yoko's and too costly when they last 43 runs.
So 'Vette right now it is in terms of competitiveness and cost!
If I can put some 295 Yoko's on I'll be a happy camper, the e9x needs it. But with similar tires, lighter weight/size, and more low-end torque though the M2 is easily the better car though in otherwise similar setup.
|
Whattttt? You're only getting 43 runs out of the yokos when you have a ton of camber?!
I'm pretty sure the E92 and M2 weigh the same (actually just looked, they both weigh ~3400 when weighed by actual owners with 1/4 tank of gas) and similar size....the M2 definitely has more torque down low, but I dont know if its actually useable. It might turn out that the M2 can only put down the same amount of torque as the M3 without blowing the tires off... I'd love to compare data on an STU E92 vs an STU M2 on the same course and see...hopefully we'll have a chance to!