10-13-2017, 04:14 PM | #67 |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
He's working on it.
He has a Mac, and a Mac won't run an exe file, so it won't install WinPep, so he hasn't been able to play with the drf files yet. As of Wednesday he figured he would use a friend's Windows computer, or else send me the drf files and I would send him back some jpeg screen shots. Another possibility we talked about was using Boot Camp to install Windows on his Mac. Has anybody here run WinPep that way?
__________________
My car specs, mods, dyno, and photos:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/dsm-profile...ld-2016.12870/ |
Appreciate
1
Endeav388.50 |
10-15-2017, 04:23 PM | #68 |
Never underestimate the Home-Bowl
484
Rep 821
Posts
Drives: F87 M2<E92 M3<E46 M3
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2017 BMW M2 [0.00]
2016 BMW M235i [0.00] 2012 BMW 120d M Spo ... [0.00] 2010 BMW M3 - SOLD [10.00] 2002 BMW Z3 2.2i Sport [0.00] 2001 BMW M3 - SOLD [9.00] |
VMWare fusion is easier than bootcamp.
__________________
2017 F87 M2, MG, M-DCT
2002 E36/7 Z3 2.2 Sport 5MT 2016 F22 M235i Coupe, MW, ZF8 |
Appreciate
1
FSociety3810.00 |
10-15-2017, 04:48 PM | #69 | |
IG @bmwF9xG80
3810
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: G80 M3, X4M, G07 X7m50
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC to NJ to Orlando FL
|
Quote:
__________________
60-130mph 6.5s X4M #HCP
60-130mph 5.0s G80 M3 #OrlandoAutowerks Sauce IG: @bmwF9XG80 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2017, 05:19 PM | #70 |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
I noticed that Boot Camp asks you if you want Win10, Win8.1, or Win7.
Dynojet tech support indicated a preference for Win7, which I like also. But, ha, in 2015 I built 2 computers using Win7, and the first thing it needed after the basic install from disk was about 3 hours of Windows updates. So do you guys have an opinion about that - with the VirtualBox (Free), VMware Fusion or Bootcamp method, would you install Win10, Win8.1, or Win7 ?
__________________
My car specs, mods, dyno, and photos:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/dsm-profile...ld-2016.12870/ |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2017, 08:31 PM | #71 |
Private First Class
271
Rep 166
Posts |
Sorry guys, haven't updated.Ive been busy, and Im not computer savyy at all.
"We're on boost" is willing to help me out. Isn't human email, and we will share the jpeg on here for you guys. Keep in mind, this is all on stock fuel(92 oct) with catless dp,intake,intercooler,muffler bypass,and jb4. All the pulls were done in 5th gear. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 03:45 AM | #72 |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
Sent some stuff back to you Maks. Looks good!
__________________
My car specs, mods, dyno, and photos:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/dsm-profile...ld-2016.12870/ |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 09:06 AM | #73 |
Private First Class
271
Rep 166
Posts |
Here you guys go. 3 pulls on each. Map 0, map 1, and map 2.
Thanks so much for the help bud! Last edited by Maks///M2; 10-19-2017 at 09:14 AM.. |
10-19-2017, 09:17 AM | #74 |
Second Lieutenant
389
Rep 237
Posts |
Did you happen to datalog the pulls on Map 1 and Map 2 while you were on the dyno? Curious to see how much boost you're running. Map 1 is making ridiculous power for the "less aggressive" map. Map 2 gains throughout the curve are quite significant. Nice numbers all around!
I just installed my JB4 and am running 50/50 WMI on Map 3 - would be nice to compare numbers before I go and dyno next week!
__________________
Instagram - @niru.s1k
24 BRG M3 - Pending Delivery 17 BSM M2 (SOLD) - PureTurbos Stage 2 - BM3 - Tuned by F80Paul @ Paul Johnson Tunes |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 09:51 AM | #75 |
Colonel
3179
Rep 2,577
Posts |
My comments:
1) Map 1 isn't really quicker. Look closer, it's a dip on red curve at 6k rpm that makes it 391whp. 2) Map 2 actually has a fatter torque curve all the way from 3200rpm. 3) Map 0, 1, 2 are basically the same above 6k, if it's not for the dip from Map1. 4) Map 0 with all hardware mods on, makes 10whp more than a 100% stock car, which makes sense. These are some amazing dyno results, even if dyno reads 15whp higher. Or maybe M2 on 93OCT does put down 350whp stock STD Smoothing 5, English racing dyno is spot on and the 330-340whp we've seen were just SAE numbers, which is 3% lower than STD. This shows JB4 actually works very well with M2, gaining 30whp from stock. M2 stock tune, with higher load than normal N55, kind of works like a BEF. These results also align pretty well with our long term tests on piggybacked and flashed M2. Short shifting a JB4 M2 at 6000-6200, you'll be amazed how quick it actually is in 100-200kph.
__________________
Lemania 2320
Last edited by SeanWRT; 10-19-2017 at 09:57 AM.. |
10-19-2017, 04:48 PM | #76 | |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
Yeah man! Glad they uploaded to the thread without any degradation. I checked, with right click, save image as, back to my computer and they are good. For example pic 1 is 1591 x 1048 pixels and 772 KB.
I looked for boost information in the drf and did not find any. Looking some more at just map 1 pulls I noticed that pull 2 was actually a hair higher than pull 3 so I think tonight I'll screenshoot that comparison. If anybody wants to see some other comparison let me know. Quote:
At these conditions the correction factor is very close to 1. Nice. That's what we almost always see at ER, I suppose because of the low altitude and moderate ambient temps. Looking right now at how much lower the numbers would be if graphed in SAE, hmmm, it's about 2.5% lower at these conditions. Based just on the max power value from map 2 pull 3, it's: STD 381.88 max power SAE 372.45 max power SAE shows the correction factor as 0.99 whereas STD shows the correction factor as 1.01.
__________________
My car specs, mods, dyno, and photos:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/dsm-profile...ld-2016.12870/ |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 05:34 PM | #77 |
IG @bmwF9xG80
3810
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: G80 M3, X4M, G07 X7m50
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC to NJ to Orlando FL
|
Very good job posting these clear images and not picture from computer thumbs up for that ,
just curious whats happening between 2500 and 3000rpm when the car makes 452wtq but drops like a bomb to to 400wtq picks up again slightly through the curve im pretty sure its missing adjustments or tweaking up the boost there, could be HPFP dipping there since even the WHP line drops at that point car would get walked by a Flash tuned or Map6 car running less boost but more linear Get yourself some logs asap u can start tweaking
__________________
60-130mph 6.5s X4M #HCP
60-130mph 5.0s G80 M3 #OrlandoAutowerks Sauce IG: @bmwF9XG80 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 05:52 PM | #78 |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
I don't know what to make of that either.
Probably would be a good idea to ask Aaron, before he forgets, what he thinks is going on there. It's very possible they could make that better. It would be really cool to have boost curves to go along with these other curves. Would probably show us something.
__________________
My car specs, mods, dyno, and photos:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/dsm-profile...ld-2016.12870/ Last edited by We're on Boost; 10-19-2017 at 05:57 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 05:52 PM | #79 | |
Private First Class
271
Rep 166
Posts |
Quote:
I wasn't logging during the pulls so that's going it of thin air. Than I spoke with rk tunes and they said the opposite. They said it's jb4. Than I spoke with wedge performance (mhd) and when he flashes you're ecu, he raises the torque limiting factor. But we didn't notice any fueling issues on the dyno. I've been driving around on map 1 without any sort of issues. I prefer map 1. Has a little better numbers imo, and no running into that torque limit to get cut off like on map 2 He has no where to tap into for the boost and I wasn't logging. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2017, 07:56 PM | #80 |
Colonel
3179
Rep 2,577
Posts |
Mark, my suggestion would be map1. Map2 can ?consume? your fuel pump over time, as it?s targeting maximum 6psi of boost down low and in the middle, resulting a really 20+psi in peak pre-throttle. One of my friend have his m2 run on JB4 map6 (targeting 18psi, almost flat) for the past 12 months, sometimes on ethanol. Had to admit his is one of the most abused m2s from our local ‘test’ group. His pump has been worn out and now can no longer sustain high load at above 6k rpm even on map1. Now he has to shift at 6k (it?s not slower doing this though) to avoid HPFP crash, he sees error code all the time, something like pictures as below I?m attaching.
BTW, FBO JB4 map1 is stock m4 quick after 60mph (even quicker below!), if you know when to shift. No doubt about it, we know it.
__________________
Lemania 2320
|
10-20-2017, 03:07 AM | #81 | |
Colonel
1072
Rep 2,351
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
M135i 8AT PWG, MHD, Pure Stage2, WMI via Torqbyte CM5-LT, Custom tuned by PureBoost
(A Dane in China) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-21-2017, 02:58 PM | #83 |
IG @bmwF9xG80
3810
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: G80 M3, X4M, G07 X7m50
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC to NJ to Orlando FL
|
You're local, PM Me
__________________
60-130mph 6.5s X4M #HCP
60-130mph 5.0s G80 M3 #OrlandoAutowerks Sauce IG: @bmwF9XG80 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-21-2017, 03:43 PM | #84 | |
Private First Class
271
Rep 166
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2017, 10:07 AM | #87 |
Brigadier General
1836
Rep 4,204
Posts |
So I have a dumb question...... during all this discussion about the JB4 was the OP or others running the JB4 with/without EWG harness installed? Just curious since I missed it mentioned
|
Appreciate
2
DragonGate71.50 FSociety3810.00 |
11-23-2017, 10:51 AM | #88 |
Colonel
3179
Rep 2,577
Posts |
If only you intend to use other than map1/2, you need ewg hardness.
__________________
Lemania 2320
|
Appreciate
2
DragonGate71.50 FSociety3810.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|