01-03-2017, 03:26 PM | #661 | |
Captain
575
Rep 790
Posts |
Quote:
For the link you provided, what he describes for the "S58" does not seem to warrant an S designation to me. By that measure, the N55B30T0 should have an S! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2017, 07:11 AM | #662 | ||
Banned
7908
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2017, 07:34 AM | #663 | ||
Captain
602
Rep 886
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2017, 03:32 PM | #664 |
Captain
575
Rep 790
Posts |
With all the x40i models already out, surely someone knows what the maintenance manual says about this.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2017, 03:35 PM | #665 | |||
Captain
292
Rep 742
Posts |
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 08:03 AM | #666 | |
Moderator
29419
Rep 13,108
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
|
Appreciate
1
dt3450.00 |
01-05-2017, 08:24 AM | #667 | |
Captain
575
Rep 790
Posts |
Quote:
Personally, I would be very surprised if they switch to the B58 for the M2 without switching to an S58 in the M3/4. They seem to have tied these models pretty closely together in design to date - with so many shared parts. By the same token, if the CS comes with a detuned S55, I would kind of expect the "base" M2 to keep the N55. Would not make sense to move the base so far away from the CS version by switching in a B58. |
|
Appreciate
1
M2 CSL446.50 |
01-05-2017, 08:27 AM | #668 |
First Lieutenant
250
Rep 372
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 10:36 AM | #669 |
Captain
113
Rep 855
Posts |
If they would just put a hotter version of the B58 in the base M2 I would just take that. I just don't want an N55 based M2.
__________________
2014 335i M Sport
2010 328i M Sport 2007 Z4MC #1019/1815 (Sold) 1997 M3 (Sold) 1991 325i |
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 12:12 PM | #672 |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,402
Posts |
It does not have more lag. Look at a dyno.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 12:23 PM | #673 |
First Lieutenant
250
Rep 372
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 12:27 PM | #675 |
Captain
575
Rep 790
Posts |
I hate to agree with PrematureApex but reviews have not noted a lot of lag either. Though that is in its x40i state of tune of course. With bigger boost (to bump up the HP and take advantage of that bigger turbo) some lag might become noticeable.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 12:58 PM | #676 |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,402
Posts |
Is that a serious question? Of course it does.
Each engine is capable of generating peak torque at like 1.2-1.3kRPM. Thus, the turbos of each spool VERY quickly, within like 100-150 RPMs of each other in fact. So, very, very similar in spool-up time. As you can see, steeper ramp-up on the B58. By the time the N55 is making its 300 ft-lbs, the B58 is already making more. The B58 makes more power at every RPM off idle.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 01:20 PM | #677 | |
Enlisted Member
24
Rep 41
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by mmmpassion; 01-05-2017 at 01:29 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
M2 CSL446.50 |
01-05-2017, 01:29 PM | #678 | |
First Lieutenant
250
Rep 372
Posts |
Yes it's a serious question. I don't know how this works but I thought a dyno graph shows what the engine produces throughout the revs. I also thought the lag is that slight delay between when you put your foot down and the engine responding.
Maybe you can make out what the lag is when watching the graph though? Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 02:04 PM | #679 | |
Captain
575
Rep 790
Posts |
Quote:
Noteworthy again that the dyno graph shown is comparing against a N55B30M0, not 0T0... so the comparison to the N55 is not really relevant. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 02:18 PM | #680 | |
Colonel
840
Rep 2,402
Posts |
Quote:
However, the graph is still very relevant for illustrating how quickly the turbos of each engine build to their peak boost after getting on the throttle. The M2's N55 isn't going to spool any quicker vs. the standard, obviously.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) Last edited by PrematureApex; 01-05-2017 at 02:24 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2017, 02:39 PM | #682 |
Lieutenant
436
Rep 571
Posts |
And it all goes silent!
There is nothing wrong with the N55. In my experience whenever you get anything new it needs to go through at least a 2 year cycle before it is in a near perfect state, or at least better than first release, there are always hidden gremlins. The n55 is in it final years which makes it a solid engine, the B58 is brand new and will no doubt have issues early days... I would like it but not in the next couple of years |
Appreciate
4
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|