06-29-2014, 02:57 PM | #23 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 119
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman
|
It's simple to value a car based on how "fast" it is, and manufactures get rich because of consumers who think this way. How much more money does it cost BMW to make an "is" version, or Porsche to make an "S" or "GTS"? The answer, as least as far as the engine is concerned, is essentially nothing- software changes are free, and it would probably cost Porsche less to manufacture and federalize only "S" motors rather than offer nine different normally aspirated motor combinations from the same family.
While it might cost them less to make them all fast, however, they would undoubtedly make far less money, simply because consumers don't blink an eye spending thousands more to get the "faster" car. The fact that most customers can't use or even notice a 10 hp difference, or that it's within manufacturing tolerances so some customers don't even get the faster car they pay for, makes very little difference. If you want to know how Porsche can average over 20k profit per car, look no further. There is a problem with this strategy, however, when it comes time to actually use the car in the US: cars are simply getting too fast. Today's sedans and SUVs are faster than yesterday's sports cars, and can be used to their full potential for a matter of seconds before risking your license on public roads. Trying to use today's hypercars is an exercise in frustration and self-restraint. Sure, you still get bragging rights and a feeling of occasion, but ever increasing potential is paradoxically leading to ever decreasing opportunity to enjoy it. Cars can't go on getting faster forever, however. People are the weak link. In the 70s to 80s race cars essentially stopped getting faster, because their drivers could no longer endure or control them, and rules have strictly limited increases in pace ever since. The fastest street cars are not much slower than yesterday's race cars, and quickly approaching a similar point. In practice they may have essentially already reached it: how much speed you can reasonably use in US when not on a track? Where do we go from here? Do cars keep getting quicker, and our ability to fully enjoy them keep going down? Some cars certainly will, because in reality many don't really buy cars to exploit their abilities anyway. Others, however, will choose a different path. When SUVs and sedans are just as quick, sports cars will be separated by feeling and involvement. And raw speed isn't the key ingredient in either of those. BMW likely knows this- they stick with rear wheel drive and adjustability, even if 4wd might now be quicker. Their greatest drivers cars have never been their fastest, but they have always been the most fun. Soon this will be even more true, and I look forward to the day when the goal is firmly on involvement and fun. I personally won't be surprised if in a decade the real drivers cars are relatively slow compared to ever quicker 4wd SUVs, etc. I know which one I'd buy...
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2014, 03:22 PM | #24 | |
Enthusiast
80
Rep 281
Posts |
Quote:
Pete, Best post I have read in a long time. Very well put and agree with everything you said!
__________________
2023 G87 M2, Brooklyn grey, HEA spec, 6 spd manual
2014 911 Carrera S, Agate grey, black int, 7spd manual 2019 M2C, HKS, 6 spd Manual. (Sold) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-08-2014, 09:13 AM | #25 | ||
Diligentia Vis Celeritas
![]() 558
Rep 1,477
Posts
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
Quote:
The M2 is the right car for BMW to build to address this segment, as it is will fill a void in their current lineup... one that many of us are seriously lamenting. With its wheelbase ~5" shorter than 3/4 series cars, the M2 will have a different feel than the M4. Presumably it will be appreciably lighter (and more nimble?), with less power as well. I'd expect it to be less GT/luxury-focused, but still retain the core creature comforts that many of us (even if we don't want to admit it) have come to appreciate. I doubt BMW will build it to lay down the fastest times around the 'Ring, but I have high hopes that this car will be their ultimate daily/track car... practical and livable on the street, capable and fun on the track. In my opinion, the best thing BMW could do is build the M2 to be "BMW's answer to the Cayman S" - light and impeccably balanced... quick, sharp and precise with tenacious grip... but with the most desirable/practical of the M4's creature comforts to ensure that it sells well and is an enjoyable daily driver road car.
__________________
Ahead of the curve for specF30
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-08-2014, 09:43 AM | #26 | |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() 7494
Rep 12,310
Posts |
Quote:
If they went out, and added those elements to a 2 Series, the M2 will sell like hot cakes. Not to mention that if they can have the car start at low $50k, it'll undercut a Cayman S by a pretty damn good margin! In terms of power, I don't even think I'd care if they literally plopped in an N55 with no mods. It's got more than enough power. Wide tracks, low center of gravity, as light as possible without blowing the budget... and some nice colors. That's the perfect recipe for me. Instead of getting an F80, I'd absolutely consider getting an M2 and keeping E36 for the same price (more or less).
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2014, 08:15 AM | #27 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 38
Rep 570
Posts |
While I'd love it if the M2 winds up handling as well and feeling as connected to the road as a Cayman S, I very much doubt it's going to happen. The Porsche starts life off with too many basic physical advantages (significantly less weight, rear weight bias, much lower COG, less mass hanging out beyond its axles, etc.). I recently watched a Top Gear (or was it Evo?) track comparison test of the 1M and the Cayman S, and the S ate the 1M's lunch, at least in terms of it being a better driver's car. Can't see the M2 being that much better unfortunately.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2014, 12:14 PM | #28 | |
Brigadier General
![]() ![]() 1913
Rep 4,128
Posts
Drives: M235i & G30 540i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boynton Beach
|
Quote:
If the regular M235i with a limited slip diff is faster (or just as fast) than a 1M and just as good without the makings of M chemistry, I will have to say that a full on M car will be much better. Look at the performance of a E90 335is vs a E90 M3. Big difference. Or you could look at the performance of a 540 vs an M5. Big difference there again. What about the 135is vs the 1M, same thing. The M version are much better in every case. Pretty much any regular BMW car compared to an M model there is a significant feel and performance difference so I don't see why the M2 will be any different. At least this is what I'm hoping. ![]() Will it be better than the Cayman S, prob not as it's much more of a car. Will the Porsche eat the M2s lunch? I seriously doubt it.
__________________
Lack of money is not the problem. It is merely a symptom of what's going on inside of you! - T Harv Eker
Follow me on Insta https://www.instagram.com/bmwm_life_/ https://www.instagram.com/autogiftua/ https://www.instagram.com/phoenixbmwlife/ ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2014, 11:22 PM | #29 | |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 119
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman
|
Quote:
Are you sure you're not thinking of EVO, M235i vs base Cayman? Remember this is a track only competition, on the road the preference may have been different:
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2014, 11:47 PM | #30 | |
New Member
0
Rep 7
Posts |
Quote:
If the M235i, which is not even designed to be an M car in mind, is already just as fast as the full fledged track version of the e46 M3, I can only imagine what a thoroughbred M2 could do and how good it'll be. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 01:13 AM | #31 | |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 38
Rep 570
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 01:20 AM | #32 | |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 38
Rep 570
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 02:52 AM | #33 | |
S0THPAW
8717
Rep 7,846
Posts |
Quote:
It generally was the other way around LOL the 1M ate the CaymanS/r whatever for breakfast ![]() As Pete stated it could have been Cayman vs M235i.... M2 will be a blast and as a daily destroy the Cayman series, on track that's another story I know that. Fun: M2. By far. Cheers Robin |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 08:22 AM | #34 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 38
Rep 570
Posts |
^ Sutcliffe begs to differ with you- see previous post. (As does Chris Harris in his comparo.) It's not about the numbers - no doubt the M2 will eat a base Cayman's lunch through a 1/4 mile.
Again, we're not talking a huge gulf between the two here, and you are giving up a lot of practicality for that extra agility and feel the Cayman offers, but the difference is there. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 12:10 PM | #35 | |
S0THPAW
8717
Rep 7,846
Posts |
Quote:
Off course there is a difference(layout ), but the 'extra agility' card played here is nothing compared to the power and overall sporty abilities in real life . Don't get me wrong, Cayman is a very sporty car made by real engineers etc , has a nice layout, chassis and stuff, but sometimes lacks power when you need it(reasons in-house called 911) It's a combo of nice chassis/layout and power what makes some sporty cars shine (the exciting and fun part) and some less imho. I remember a few years ago me driving a 330d and a first gen Cayman came up (Autobahn near Cologne) . He tried to accellerate from me which he could not do(to about 220kmh) . Then we got to the off ramps overthere. Same story. He was not running away.On the contrary. And again on the straight same story. I was driving a big heavy diesel fgs... It's not about the numbers you say: I agree. 1M is incredibly underrated in many many ways by BMW/M and naysayers ![]() Cheers Robin Last edited by Robin_NL; 07-10-2014 at 12:19 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2014, 01:40 PM | #36 | |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 119
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman
|
Quote:
Similarly I think you're misrepresenting Chris Harris's views on the same comparison- can you point me the where you think he "begs to differ"? He chose the 1M as the one car he'd want to daily drive two years in a row, price no object. So he's a pretty huge fan of the 1M. I'd like to see where you think he favors the Cayman. Personally I've got a lot of seat time in both cars, both of the street and in competition. Zero question which one I prefer on the street. Don't assume accurate automatically mean better.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 02:06 AM | #37 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 38
Rep 570
Posts |
To repeat myself, I already said that "eat the 1M's lunch" was an exaggeration. Steve definitely preferred the Cayman, and Chris also preferred its handling - he liked other aspects of the 1M (engine). People can watch the videos themselves and make up their own mind as to the degree of preference.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 11:44 AM | #38 | |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 119
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman
|
Quote:
So you support your initial exaggeration with more inaccuracy. You could just say you prefer the Cayman, that would be fine. Hopefully you've come to that conclusion based on actual experience with the cars in question, not simply misrecollection of what others have said about them.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 12:49 PM | #39 | |
Diligentia Vis Celeritas
![]() 558
Rep 1,477
Posts
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
And the M235i is already faster around the 'ring than the 1M, so I think it's a pretty safe bet that the M2 will be faster yet.
__________________
Ahead of the curve for specF30
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 06:50 PM | #40 | |
Brigadier General
![]() ![]() 1913
Rep 4,128
Posts
Drives: M235i & G30 540i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boynton Beach
|
Quote:
Where have you been past few months? The M235i with a LSD is already faster, and do you really think BMW will make a successor to the 1M slower than the original one? Come on man what are you thinking?
__________________
Lack of money is not the problem. It is merely a symptom of what's going on inside of you! - T Harv Eker
Follow me on Insta https://www.instagram.com/bmwm_life_/ https://www.instagram.com/autogiftua/ https://www.instagram.com/phoenixbmwlife/ ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 10:11 PM | #41 |
Major
![]() ![]() 289
Rep 1,075
Posts |
You guys probably already seen this right?
M4 vs 911 Carrera
__________________
Current: F87 M2 MT MPE, E84 PP SP LP
Previous: F30 - 335i AT, E90 - 335xi MT, E90 - 330i MT, E46 - 330i MT |
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2014, 04:28 PM | #43 |
Brigadier General
![]() ![]() 827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
Not even the M3 GTS could compete with the Porsche GT3; there's no way a M2 will either.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|