Quote:
Originally Posted by VF-Engineering
That's an interesting observation, but not a realistic comparison
for Stage ONE upgrading to Stage TWO, as RedCarrot mentioned,
different cars with different hardware combinations, on different
dynos, under different conditions.
Here is a much more accurate example which removes all of those
possible variable. Same car, same dyno, same fuel, with detailed
hardware/software changes between runs.
 [ ▉] = Stock [ ▉] = Stage ONE [ ▉] = Stage TWO
Stage ONE Gains
Peak Gains: 19HP / 53TQ (at the wheels)
MAX Gains: 41HP @ 3,900rpm / 53TQ @ 3,050rpm
Stage TWO Gains
Peak Gains: 56HP / 83TQ (at the wheels)
MAX Gains: 65HP @ 4,500rpm / 86TQ @ 3,300rpm
Stage ONE -to- Stage TWO Gains
Peak Gains: 37HP / 30TQ (at the wheels)
MAX Gains: 40HP @ 5,600rpm / 36TQ @ 5,500rpm
For the naysayers who will inevitably point out that these are
"marketing plots", we've proven time and time again that our
advertised gains are on the conservative side, and independent
dyno results will (more often than not) meet or exceed our own
posted results.
This is by design as we believe that in the long run,
realistic claims + proven results will ultimately win
over optimistic claims + glory runs
|
Dyno looks good. Can you provide more details on the car used, mods between stages, and conditions?