View Single Post
      03-03-2014, 04:44 PM   #113
Roundown
Colonel
576
Rep
2,353
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozinaldo
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchRacerYo View Post
Judging by all the replies following this one, I know I'm in the majority. The 1M was just a much better 135is.

Saying the 1M is more of an M car than the M3 is just ignorant and all around stupid.
I'll let EVO, Auto-Bild, Chris Harris and other bunch of morons who owned or still ownes both cars and unexplainably thought the 1M was 'even better' than the wonderful M3, let know about your refined opinion.

What kind of absurdity going on in this thread? Just flaming someone who told that he liked the 1M more! There really are lots of people like that and for good reason; on the other all I find in these kind of posts are a deep hatred and insecurity.

You even forget that better half of your M3 is shared with the 1M, which is also smaller with a shorter wheelbase and lighter too, with almost 50% more tq than the S65 can produce available from almost 5000 rpm before! How can it be anything bad?

First of all, if you guys didn't like the 1M back then don't even think that you will like the F8X M3/M4 or a probable M2. Just keep your S65 equipped cars and stop throwing in threads with other cars or any BMW developed after 2010!
Tq curve on the S65 is remarkably (for a high revving NA motor) flat at ~250 to it's peak of 295.
Appreciate 0