View Single Post
      10-19-2017, 09:51 AM   #75
SeanWRT
Colonel
SeanWRT's Avatar
3179
Rep
2,577
Posts

Drives: E90 M3 & F87 M2
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Shanghai

iTrader: (1)

My comments:
1) Map 1 isn't really quicker. Look closer, it's a dip on red curve at 6k rpm that makes it 391whp.
2) Map 2 actually has a fatter torque curve all the way from 3200rpm.
3) Map 0, 1, 2 are basically the same above 6k, if it's not for the dip from Map1.
4) Map 0 with all hardware mods on, makes 10whp more than a 100% stock car, which makes sense.

These are some amazing dyno results, even if dyno reads 15whp higher. Or maybe M2 on 93OCT does put down 350whp stock STD Smoothing 5, English racing dyno is spot on and the 330-340whp we've seen were just SAE numbers, which is 3% lower than STD. This shows JB4 actually works very well with M2, gaining 30whp from stock. M2 stock tune, with higher load than normal N55, kind of works like a BEF.

These results also align pretty well with our long term tests on piggybacked and flashed M2. Short shifting a JB4 M2 at 6000-6200, you'll be amazed how quick it actually is in 100-200kph.
__________________
Lemania 2320

Last edited by SeanWRT; 10-19-2017 at 09:57 AM..
Appreciate 2
Endeav388.50
FSociety3812.50