View Single Post
      08-19-2014, 11:29 AM   #28
Pete_vB
Captain
Pete_vB's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
Wow! So everything is the fault of an anonymous poster on a car forum?
The collective "you". So everyone that simplistically values cars by their performance numbers alone... You too perhaps?

Look at the post above-
Quote:
If the M2 performed as well as the M4 it would be about the same price.
It's true, but why? It's a smaller car, has less stuff, and could have the same performance with a smaller motor. It should cost less. But if it did, and it performed as well as the M4, BMW would sell far less M4s. Because car buyers looks to performance numbers to try and figure out what a car is worth. And it's that simplistic attitude that guarantees that car manufactures won't build the cars they easily could:
  • An M2 with an M4 motor should cost thousands less to build than an M4 but be faster.
  • A Cayman with a 3.8 S or GT3 motor should be a budget supercar.
  • A VW R with the Audi 5 cylinder would be a budget GT-R.

All great cars that would be easy to make and sell well, but that we'll never see because of the attitude on display here. Something to think about...
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
Appreciate 0